Surface plasmon polaritons at metal / insulator interfaces

Monster1771
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the metal-vacuum interface located at z = 0,the metal filling the entire half-space z ≥ 0, vacuum filling (!?) the half-space z < 0. The dielectric function in the metal in the long-wavelength limit is given by:
fd7a516016b09d30cdfca8d7c47caf37627.png

where ε0 is the vacuum permittivity. In the metal a solution of Laplace’s equation ∇2φ = 0 is
29a96a81799c97e4145b6ee2d4a179db105.png

8b51affd50a3b66259d31e5d9bdf6c72888.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Tried to solve this problem for 8 hours, still no result. Maybe some of you might help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) How are E and the scalar potential related? Note: the tangential derivative in this case is simply ##\frac{\partial}{\partial x}##, and the normal derivative is ##\frac{\partial}{\partial z}##. Check to see if the solutions provided satisfy the boundary condition that the tangential component of the electric field is continuous at the interface (z=0).

b) Similar to (a), but now you check the normal direction and use the macroscopic formalism (D as opposed to E). The problem tells you that the normal component of D will be continuous (means 0 free charge at the interface). Use the given formula for the dielectric function of the metal and solve for ##\omega##. What can you conclude about the optically-active oscillations at the interface?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top