Surjective group homomorphism

  • Thread starter Thread starter e12514
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Surjective
e12514
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show the map (call it phi) from U_n to C*
defined by phi(X) = det(X) for all matrices X in U_n,
is a surjective homomorphism, where

U_n is the subgroup of GL(n,C) consisting of unitary matrices
C* = C\{0} = invertible/nonzero complex numbers
det(.) is the determinant of .



Homework Equations



A matrix X in GL(n,C) is unitary if ((X_bar)^T).X = I
where X_bar is the conjugate of X (taking the conjugate of each entry in X)


The Attempt at a Solution



Homomorphism is easy to verify:
phi(XY) = det(XY) = det(X) det(Y) = phi(X) phi(Y)


I'm having trouble showing it's surjective.

For it to be surjective we need
for all (a+bi) in C* there exists X in U_n such that phi(X) = det(X) = a+bi
where a and b not both zero

The problem is X needs to be unitary, that is, X-conjugate-transpose times X needs to be the identity matrix.
It follows the the required matrix X can't be a diagonal matrix, otherwise it is not unitary if its determinant is (a+bi), in particular every entry on that diagonal where there's a complex number x+yi, that entry will become (x^2 + y^2) after taking ((X_bar)^T).X instead of the required "1" on the diagonal of an identity matrix.

Similarly I couldn't get anywhere with triangular matrices, and any non-diagonal and non-triangular matrix seems to get too complicated, not to mention that triangular matrices are messy enough...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's definitely not going to be surjective -- the determinant of a unitary matrix lies on the unit circle.
 
Hmm... that's true. Maybe there was a typo on the question.
Unless there is some other interpretation for what C* is...
 
Maybe it was indeed meant that
C* = { z \in C : ||z|| = 1 }
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top