Swinging Atwood Machine, Hamilton-Jacobi Eq.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
This is a question about the swinging Atwood machine. I have completed the first half of the problems which involved finding a lagrangian involving the obvious co-ordinates, finding the conjugate momenta and writing a new Hamiltonian:

H = E = \frac{p_{\theta}^2}{2mr^2}+\frac{p_r^2}{2(m+M)}-gr(m \cos \theta - M)

We are then given the expression for the energy under the following transformations:

r = \frac{\xi^2 +\eta^2}{2}

\theta = 2\arctan\left(\frac{\xi^2-\eta^2}{2\xi\eta}\right)

Which is:
eq1.png


We are looking at the case where M=3m (the system is integrable) Rather than just changing a sign somewhere in E I decided to use
L=2T-E

After plugging this in and doing some cancellations I found that:

T = 2m(\xi^2\eta^2)(\dot{\eta}^2+\dot{\xi}^2)

L=2m(\eta^2+\xi^2)(\dot{\eta}^2+\dot{\xi}^2)-2mg \frac{\xi^4+\eta^4}{\xi^2+\eta^2}

Now I have the Lagrangian I can find the canonically conjugate momenta for xi and eta as the partial derivatives of my Lagrangian with respect to their corresponding time derivatives. Plugging this into the equation for the Hamiltonian I get a new H:

H = \frac{p_{\eta}^2+p_{\xi}^2}{8m(\eta^2+\xi^2)}+2mg \frac{\eta^4+\xi^4}{\eta^2+\xi^2}

Then we come to the bit I am stuck on the part about the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. I don't know if I've made a mistake somewhere but I thought the transformations were supposed to simplify the problem?

Using HJE

\frac{1}{8m(\xi^2+\eta^2)} \left[ \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial \xi} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial \eta} \right)^2 \right] + 2mg \frac{\eta^4 + \xi^4 }{\eta^2+\xi^2} + \frac{\partial S}{\partial t} = 0

So they're separable so take S,

S(\eta, \xi, t) = W_1(\xi) +W_2(\eta) - Et

where E is the energy.

Then I deduce that:

\frac{1}{8m(\xi^2+\eta^2)}\left[ \left( \frac{d W_1(\xi)}{d \xi} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{d W_2(\eta)}{d \eta} \right)^2 \right] + 2mg \frac{\eta^4 + \xi^4 }{\eta^2+\xi^2} = E

Then because it's separable or at least we are assuming it is:

\left( \frac{d W_1(\xi)}{d \xi} \right)^2 = 8\xi^2m (E-2mg \xi^2)
\left( \frac{d W_2(\eta)}{d \eta} \right)^2 = 8\eta^2m (E-2mg \eta^2)

Which is solvable giving:

W_1(\xi) = -\frac{\sqrt{2} (E-2m\eta^2)^{3/2}}{2\sqrt{m}}
W_2(\eta) = -\frac{\sqrt{2} (E-2m\xi^2)^{3/2}}{2\sqrt{m}}

Am I wrong in splitting it up this way? The question says to separate them with separation constant I

q1.png


What is separation constant I, and have I separated properly? Is the Hamiltonian correct? I am unsure on how going from here I will eventually get an EoM. And what the point of the transformations were really.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your a second year at durham aren't you?

this is our homework for Theoretical Physics.

I don't know - haven't looked at it.

tbh - feign illness. easiest way out.

or if you actually want to do it - get Hand and Finch out of the Library - its pretty helpful.
 
No thanks I'd rather just do it. Got the book
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top