Switching Fields: Advice for ChemE Senior Applying to EE PhD Programs

  • Thread starter Thread starter OscarDevaltra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a ChemE senior applying to graduate schools for a PhD in Electrical Engineering (EE), expressing concerns about competitiveness due to a lack of traditional EE background. Despite a strong GPA and relevant research experience, the individual questions whether they will be at a disadvantage compared to typical EE candidates. Responses highlight that while transitioning fields can be challenging, especially for top programs, it is not impossible. Emphasis is placed on the interdisciplinary nature of nanotechnology, suggesting that a ChemE background may not be a significant barrier. It is recommended to demonstrate motivation and capability in the statement of purpose, and to be prepared for potentially starting with foundational EE courses. Overall, the consensus is that with strong qualifications and a clear rationale for the field switch, applying to top schools remains a viable option.
OscarDevaltra
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm currently a ChemE senior, and I'm applying to grad schools. I have a very good GPA, research, extracurrics, etc. So I would have little worry about getting into a top PhD program in ChemE.

But I want a PhD in Electrical Engineering.

There are many reasons behind this motivation (which I won't go into now). Currently, I'm most interested in micro/nanofabrication. I've taken some courses in this subject, especially related to biotechnology. I also plan to minor in EE before graduation. But does anyone know how competitive I really am? I understand that nanotech. is a multidisciplinary field but am I still at a big disadvantage when compared to other EE students? Am I wasting my time by applying to the top schools?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look on the school's website you may wish to apply to. Often you can be admitted into another program because for example if you are a chemE major you have demonstrated you can handle the type of work. If you are inadiquately prepared relative to incoming EE majors you may have to begin your coursework with lower level EE classes but this is definitely possible and has been done before.
 
OscarDevaltra said:
Am I still at a big disadvantage when compared to other EE students? Am I wasting my time by applying to the top schools?

Yes, of course. Not having the usual expected preliminary credential is a huge disadvantage, especially when it comes to the top schools. Are you *that* much better than the other candidates for admission that they'll let you in without the usual background?

If you really want to switch fields, I would encourage you to keep trying... but realize how much harder you are making it for yourself. Your choices are either to back up and get a BS or MS in your desired field, or be *much* better than the competition.
 
only the degree names are different. if u really demonstrate strong motivation to pursue phd in EE, you might be in the same league as other EE background ppl.
also, i think, you should precisely explain in ur SOPurpose/SOInterest, why you're switching fields and how that makes you an eligible contender.
nanotech is quite interdisciplinary, so i think chemical engg background should not be too much of a problem/disadvantage, as long as you're open and willing to learn new stuff.
 
I think graduate schools are less interested in your background and more interested in your ability to do research. If you have a ChemE degree I think that shows you have the quantitative background to make up any EE courses you are missing. You can probably also find a project in nanotech that has people in both EE and ChemE departments working on it.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
83
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top