Prove R^n is Symmetric for All Positive Integers n

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsuser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation Symmetric
AI Thread Summary
To prove that R^n is symmetric for all positive integers n, it starts with the assumption that R is symmetric, meaning if (a,b) is in R, then (b,a) is also in R. For n=1, R^1 equals R, which is symmetric by assumption. The discussion then explores the inductive step, assuming (a,b) and (b,a) are in R^k, leading to R^{k+1} being defined as R^k composed with R. A misunderstanding arises regarding the definition of a symmetric relation, clarifying that the correct interpretation is that for any a and b, if (a,b) is in R, then (b,a) must also be in R. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in definitions to support the proof.
physicsuser
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
Question: Let R be a symmetric relation on set A. Show that R^n is symetric for all positive integers n.

My "solution":
Suppose R is symmetric,
<br /> \exists a,b \in A ((a,b) \in R \wedge (b,a) \in R)<br /> <br />

For n=1,
R^1=R.
Next, assume that (a,b) and (b,a) \in R^k, for k a possitive integer. So R^{k+1}=R^k \circ R.

Then what? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your definition of "symmetric relation" is not correct.

What you wrote is, in words, "there exist a and b such that (a,b) is in R and (b,a) is in R". The correct definition is "for any a, b IF (a,b) is in R, then (b,a) is also in R".
 
Uhm, yes. That is the definition. So if R is symmetric doesn't that mean that there exist (a,b) and (b,a) in R?
 
help? please :frown:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top