I would like to ask if anybody knows about some analysis of this part in Einstein's derivation of SR where he gets rid of unknown scaling function φ(v):(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

"From reasons of symmetry it is now evident that the length of a given rod moving perpendicularly to its axis, measured in the stationary system, must depend only on the velocity and not on the direction and the sense of the motion. The length of the moving rod measured in the stationary system does not change, therefore, ifvand−vare interchanged. Hence follows thatl/φ(v) = l/φ(−v), or

φ(v) = φ(−v)."

As it seems to me these reasons of symmetry are basically assumption that there is no preferred reference frame and transformations between different reference frames should be completely symmetric without any reference to some absolute state of motion.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Symmetry assumption in derivation of SR

Loading...

Similar Threads for Symmetry assumption derivation |
---|

B What is Lorentz Symmetry? |

A What apart from geodesic distance matters in a spacetime that has lost its maximal symmetry? |

I Assumption that the rest mass energy is mc^2 |

B Confusion about time dilation symmetry in muon example |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**