Synchronous Sources and Interference

AI Thread Summary
Synchronous sources in the context of interference refer to sources that operate at the same frequency and maintain a constant phase relationship, often assumed to be zero phase difference. The term "coherent" is more commonly used in English to describe these conditions, leading to confusion about whether "synchronous" and "coherent" are interchangeable. A secondary school textbook translated from French uses "synchronous" to describe the conditions for interference, which has raised questions about its accuracy and meaning. It is suggested that "synchronous" might imply both sources are coherent and have the same frequency, but this redundancy creates confusion. Clarification of terminology in translated physics texts is necessary for better understanding.
bgq
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Hi,

What is the scientific definition of "synchronous sources" when we talk about the conditions of interference?

Thank you.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Same Frequency and a Constant Phase relationship between them. ("Usually" the phase difference is assumed to be zero.)
 
  • Like
Likes bgq
In English, we usually say "coherent" instead of "synchronous" in this context.
 
  • Like
Likes bgq
Well, is this mean that "coherent" and "synchronous" are the same? Is it just a linguistic issue?
 
Where have you seen the term "synchronous sources" in the context of interference? I've never seen it, before this thread. "Coherent" is the standard term, in English-language textbooks etc.

I said "usually" in my previous post because I wanted to leave myself a loophole in case someone actually gave an example. :oldwink:
 
  • Like
Likes bgq
Actually, I have completed two years general physics in university, I have learned that the sources should be coherent (talking about interference).

A student in the secondary school asked me about synchronous. In his textbook (translated from french), they say about the conditions of interference that the sources should be synchronous and coherent. I tried to understand the word "synchronous" literally, but I cannot find anything that makes a sense.

It seems from the examples in his textbook, that they mean by "synchronous" having same frequency. But I thing this doesn't make any sense because coherent sources have already same frequency; beside this, I cannot understand how the word "synchronous" could mean having same frequency.
 
I've not heard the term either. But "coherent" could be describing each source as having a well defined frequency and a long coherence time individually, and "synchronous" adding that both coherent sources have the same frequency.

I guess, anyway. There certainly are linguistic oddities with translated physics.

The text ought to define its own terms somewhere. I take it there are no helpful index or glossary entries?
 
  • Like
Likes bgq
OK, thank you all very much :smile:
 
Back
Top