Systems held together by gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wuratch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Systems
Wuratch
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For any system of particles held together by mutual attraction
U(potential) = -2 U(Kinetic)

Suppose you add energy to such a system and wait for it to equilibrate, does the total kinetic energy increase or decrease? Explain

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Apparently the kinetic energy decreases. How can you explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, suppose you add energy to the earth-moon system. That moves the moon to a higher orbit. Does the kinetic energy decrease or increase?
 
Dick said:
Well, suppose you add energy to the earth-moon system. That moves the moon to a higher orbit. Does the kinetic energy decrease or increase?

It would increase and that's what I thought. But the book says that it is a system with a negative heat capacity. It's entropy vs. energy graph is concave-up. When you add energy, all the energy apparently goes into the potential energy and the particles in the system get farther apart and actually slow down. I don't fully understand this and don't know how to to give the explanation without just repeating what the book says
 
Actually the moon moving to a higher orbit means that it must slow down...

Note: mv^2/r=GMm/r^2 (M is mass of Earth, m is mass of moon)=> v=sqrt(GM/r) so that as r increases, v decreases.

Increasing the energy of a system in virial equilibrium goes like this:

E increases, so that T+U increases, but U=-2T, so that T-2T=-T increases. An increase in "negative T" means that T decreases and U increases. By U increases, we mean U becomes less negative.

For example, if E=-2J, T=2J, U=-4J, and I add 1J to this system, E now has to be -1J, and now I have a system of equations:

-1J=T+U, and U=-2T. Solving: -1J=T-2T=-T => T=1J, U=-2J. So you notice that U got less negative (went up) and T went down.
 
Hey, I tried to do this in this way:

I use V for potential energy and T for kinetic energy.

Given equation reads:

V=-2T

V+T=-T

Now you see that the left hand site is a total energy:

E_{tot}=-T

Differentiate the whole thing:

dE_{tot}=-dT

So if the total energy is increasing then dE_{tot}>0 and thus dT<0. This means that the kinetic energy is decreasing.
 
Thanks everyone. I realize my mistake was trying to explain it with just words
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top