Systems held together by gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wuratch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Systems
Wuratch
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For any system of particles held together by mutual attraction
U(potential) = -2 U(Kinetic)

Suppose you add energy to such a system and wait for it to equilibrate, does the total kinetic energy increase or decrease? Explain

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Apparently the kinetic energy decreases. How can you explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, suppose you add energy to the earth-moon system. That moves the moon to a higher orbit. Does the kinetic energy decrease or increase?
 
Dick said:
Well, suppose you add energy to the earth-moon system. That moves the moon to a higher orbit. Does the kinetic energy decrease or increase?

It would increase and that's what I thought. But the book says that it is a system with a negative heat capacity. It's entropy vs. energy graph is concave-up. When you add energy, all the energy apparently goes into the potential energy and the particles in the system get farther apart and actually slow down. I don't fully understand this and don't know how to to give the explanation without just repeating what the book says
 
Actually the moon moving to a higher orbit means that it must slow down...

Note: mv^2/r=GMm/r^2 (M is mass of Earth, m is mass of moon)=> v=sqrt(GM/r) so that as r increases, v decreases.

Increasing the energy of a system in virial equilibrium goes like this:

E increases, so that T+U increases, but U=-2T, so that T-2T=-T increases. An increase in "negative T" means that T decreases and U increases. By U increases, we mean U becomes less negative.

For example, if E=-2J, T=2J, U=-4J, and I add 1J to this system, E now has to be -1J, and now I have a system of equations:

-1J=T+U, and U=-2T. Solving: -1J=T-2T=-T => T=1J, U=-2J. So you notice that U got less negative (went up) and T went down.
 
Hey, I tried to do this in this way:

I use V for potential energy and T for kinetic energy.

Given equation reads:

V=-2T

V+T=-T

Now you see that the left hand site is a total energy:

E_{tot}=-T

Differentiate the whole thing:

dE_{tot}=-dT

So if the total energy is increasing then dE_{tot}>0 and thus dT<0. This means that the kinetic energy is decreasing.
 
Thanks everyone. I realize my mistake was trying to explain it with just words
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top