Take the real part of complex wave function

kiranm
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



how do I take the real part of y2= A exp (4ix) exp (-2it)? And how does this determine that this wave propagates with constant speed compared to these wave disturbances:
y1= A sin (5x) exp (-2t)
y3= A sin (2x-5t) exp (-2t)

Homework Equations



exp(ix)= cos x + i sin x

The Attempt at a Solution



For Re(y2) i got A cos (4x) cos (-2t). I don't think that is correct i just don't know how to combine that because i know taking the real part is the cos but my attempt doesn't make sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's start with the real part question.

You are right that exp(ix) = cos(x) + i sin(x), so you can plug that into the equation:
exp(4ix) exp(-2it) = (... + ... i)(... + ... i)
When work out the brackets, so you can write it in the form
Re(y2) + Im(y2) i

Or you can first combine the exponentials to exp(4ix) exp(-2it) = exp(...) and then use the identity.
 
so would it be exp(4ix-2it) = exp i(4x-2t)= cos (4x-2t) + i sin (4x-2t)?
 
but I am not understanding how this tells u that the wave propagates at constant speed with no change in its profile compared to the other two wave disturbances?

and how can u tell that y1 is a stationary wave whose amplitude is decreasing exponentially with time and that y3 is a traveling wave also decreasing exponentially with time?
 
Examine the angle 4x-2t. If that stays the same, y2 obviously stays the same as well. So, what's required for 4x-2t to keep constant as t changes? Can you prove that if x=x0+vt for any x0 and some v, then 4x-2t is a constant? What does "v" have to be?

Once you prove that, the second part:

and how can u tell that y1 is a stationary wave whose amplitude is decreasing exponentially with time and that y3 is a traveling wave also decreasing exponentially with time?

should be easy. Examine the sinuisoidal part of y1; what's v? Do the same for y3, then consider what effect the exponential term has on the wavefunction.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top