Taking Intro to Linear Algebra, Probability, and Vector Calc in same semester?

AI Thread Summary
Taking Intro to Linear Algebra, Vector Calculus for Applications, and Intro to Probability in the same semester raises concerns about workload and time management. While some believe that managing more than two math classes is feasible, especially for students planning to attend graduate school, others caution against it, particularly for those still adjusting to college-level math. The discussion highlights that Linear Algebra is not a prerequisite for Vector Calculus, but familiarity with matrices and determinants can enhance understanding. The proposed semester's courses are considered less rigorous, suggesting that it may be a suitable time to challenge oneself with three classes. Ultimately, the decision should balance the desire for deeper engagement with math against the potential for overwhelming workload.
nickadams
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Hi, is it a bad idea to take

Intro to Linear Algebra
Vector Calc for Applications (Marsden)
Intro to Probability (book called first course in probability by ross)

.. in the same semester?

This semester I took discrete math and Calc 1 at the same time and it was pretty time consuming but that is partially because I like to spend a lot of time "playing around" with problems and concepts in the books that were not covered in class; making up problems etc.

The vector calc class is mostly for engineering majors but I feel it would help me prepare for the class "marsden basic complex analysis" for which ODE or vector cal is a prereq. (I took ODE in summer school a long time ago and forgot it all)Many people recommend taking no more than 2 math classes per semester and I agree because I like being able to devote a lot of time getting comfortable with the material (asking supplementary questions in office hours and such) but what do I fill the rest of my schedule with? I already finished the general education requirements and I'd like to spend most of my studying time on math rather than some filler courses that I put on my schedule just to remain a full-time student but it would not be plausible at all for me to have 4 math courses per semester especially as i get into harder and harder math.. So what to do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not taking more than 2 classes in one semester is madness. You should be able to take more classes at this point. If you're planning to go to grad school, then you will have to take (about) 4 classes each semester anyway, so you should get used to it.

I'm wondering if you need linear algebra for vector calculus. Is linear algebra a prereq for vector calculus?? In any case, I think you should know some things about matrices and determinants before taking vector calculus, it'll make things much easier.
 
micromass said:
Not taking more than 2 classes in one semester is madness. You should be able to take more classes at this point. If you're planning to go to grad school, then you will have to take (about) 4 classes each semester anyway, so you should get used to it.

I'm wondering if you need linear algebra for vector calculus. Is linear algebra a prereq for vector calculus?? In any case, I think you should know some things about matrices and determinants before taking vector calculus, it'll make things much easier.

mathwonk said in a thread a while ago that it is a bad idea to take more than 2 math classes in a semester, but he was probably thinking of upper-level harvard-difficulty classes not state school probability courses and the like :-p.And the proposed semester (vector calc, probability, LA) is only my second semester of taking math classes so how can you say "you should be able to take more classes at this point"? Does it typically only take 1 semester to get to the point where one can manage 3 math classes at a time? Keep in mind that high school where I live is not as rigourous as where you are from most likely and I came to college with poor study habits and 0 math knowledge.And LA is not a prereq for vector calc for applications. Here is the description of that course:

Topics include matrices, elements of vector analysis and calculus functions of several variables, including gradient, divergence, and curl of a vector field, multiple integrals and chain rules, length and area, line and surface integrals, Greens theorem in the plane and space. If time permits, topics in complex analysis may be included. This course has three lectures and two problem sessions each week. It is anticipated that most students will be engineering majors. Five sessions a week for one semester.
I guess it is better to get used to taking 3 courses now with these easier classes than it would be to try to start taking 3 later on.. THanks
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top