Tangent line of curve of intersection

AvalonX
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the parametric equations of the line tangent to the curve of intersection of the paraboloid
z = x² + y² and the ellipsoid 4x² + y² + z² = 9 at the point ( -1, 1, 2 ).

Homework Equations



Probable use of the gradient vector (as this is the chapter we are in)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have found what I believe to be the curve of intersection by setting the equations of the surfaces equal to each other:

x² + y² - z = 4x² + y² + z² - 9
9 = 3x² + z² + z
F(x,y,z) = 3x² + z² + z - 9 (as a function)

And the corresponding gradient vector:
< 6x, 0, 2z + 1 >

But I cannot figure out how to convert this from cartesian to polar (or if I even need to) and get the correct answer. I've tried several paths (i.e. substituting x=rcosσ) but my answer never matches the expected answer, which contains no trigonometry. Does the correct approach involve substituting x² + y² for z? This seems to be the most logical approach but I haven't been able to apply it correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is unclear to me why you want the tangent line in polar coordinates. The text seems only to call for a parametric line, eg. \bar{r} = \bar{k} t +\bar{r}_0.
 
Your right! I was thinking of a vector equation. Then I suppose the parametric equations would look something like: x = -1 +3t², y = 1, z = 3 + t² ? But that still doesn't contain the expected y component, I must be doing something wrong yet.
 
A line parametric in, say, t should be linear in t, otherwise its not a line. Think about which point the line passes through and what vector direction it "follows" from that point as t varies.
 
I remember why I wanted the vector equation. The only way I can think to find the tangent line is by taking the derivative of a vector equation.
 
Never mind. By crossing the gradients I found the tangent vector. This makes perfect sense, it was so simple :D :D
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top