Tangent of plane to a given surface

gomes.
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/2033/tangent.jpg

I managed to do the first part okay ---- said some stuff about 3x^2 and y^2 term, its not linear etc..

but I am stuck in the part in red. Is it supposed to be something about a normal vector? How do i know what is wrong? and what mistake was made?

I calculated the equation of the tangent plane and it is: z=12(x−2)−6(y−3)-1

and the tangent plane has normal vector (12,-6,-1) at (2,3) ----- could it be something to do with the part circled in red?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
gomes. said:
[PLAIN]http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/2033/tangent.jpg

I managed to do the first part okay ---- said some stuff about 3x^2 and y^2 term, its not linear etc..
That's not wrong, but it's not such a good answer either. There is a very specific mistake that the student is making here.

but I am stuck in the part in red. Is it supposed to be something about a normal vector? How do i know what is wrong? and what mistake was made?

I calculated the equation of the tangent plane and it is: z=12(x−2)−6(y−3)-1

and the tangent plane has normal vector (12,-6,-1) at (2,3) ----- could it be something to do with the part circled in red?
The second one is clearly an attempt at a solution in parametric form (as opposed to the Cartesian for of part "a"). The solution is very nearly correct too, but not quite. Why don't you attempt to derive a correct solution in parametric form and compare it with the given solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
uart said:
The second one is clearly an attempt at a solution in parametric form (as opposed to the Cartesian for of part "a"). The solution is very nearly correct too, but not quite. Why don't you attempt to derive a correct solution in parametric form and compare it with the given solution.


Thanks, i got (lamba, mu, 12lamba-6mu-7)

So can i say the student forgot to put/calculate in the -7 in the parametric form? At a glance, how would i know the student got it wrong? Because he didnt put in the -7?
 
gomes. said:
Thanks, i got (lamba, mu, 12lamba-6mu-7)

So can i say the student forgot to put/calculate in the -7 in the parametric form? At a glance, how would i know the student got it wrong? Because he didnt put in the -7?

Yeah at a glance just check whether or not the equation is satisfied at the given point (2,3,-1).

Normally with a parametric equation like this I like to keep it in an expanded form like :

(x,y,z) = (1, 0, 12)\, \lambda \, + \, (0, 1, -6) \, \mu \, + \, (2, 3, -1)

In this form it's really obvious that the student has forgotten the last "fixed point" term.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top