Problem finding tangential acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating tangential acceleration for a point on a rotating turntable. The user is trying to determine the radial, tangential, and total acceleration at a specific time during the motion. For radial acceleration, they calculated -1.25 m/s², interpreting the negative sign as indicating direction towards the center. The tangential acceleration was found to be 0.4 m/s², which is derived from the change in velocity over time, and this value is confirmed as constant for the scenario. Clarifications were made regarding the interpretation of signs in acceleration direction and the redundancy of certain calculations.
Roq
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm having problem finding tangential acceleration. I was trying to find some examples of this being done in my book and on the web, but I couldn't. So I hope someone can help me with this.

The problem is: "A point on a rotating turntable 20.0cm from the center accelerates from rest to a speed of 0.700 m/s in 1.75s. At t=1.25s, find the magnitude and direction of (a) the radial acceleration, (b) the tangential acceleration, and (c) the total acceleration of the point."

The book as only covered uniform acceleration at this point, so I assumed it was here although it did not say.

For part (a), to try and find the acceleration I did: .7m/1.75, and multiplied it by 1.25 to get the velocity at the time, getting .5 m/s. I divided -.5^2 by .2 (20 cm converted to m), getting -1.25 m/s^2. It asked for the direction, and I think the direction is given by the minus sign, indicating it is towards the center.
I am stuck on part (b). The formula for tangential acceleration is d|v|/dt, but I am unsure what formula that I have for velocity. In this case,
v = acceleration * time = 0.4m/s^2(t). So if I derived that I would get .4m/s^2. Is this the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a point in circular motion, all of the velocity is tangential. So you've already found the tangential acceleration when you found (.7 m/sec)/(1.75 sec) which gives .4 m/sec^2, and as you've assumed it's constant. You don't need that last calculation you did. It's redundant. BTW, the direction of the radial acceleration isn't really 'given by the minus sign'. You just put the minus sign in. In circular motion the radial acceleration is always 'towards the center'.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top