Taylor's Formula Question?

  • Thread starter sponsoredwalk
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Formula
In summary: R^3Now, we set the upper bound "b" to "x" and the lower bound "a" to "0" to get rid of the t's. \int_{0}^{x} f' (t)\,dt \ = \ - f'(t)(x \ - \ t) |^x_0 \ - \ \int_{0}^{x} - f''(t)(x \ - \ t)\,dt \ + \ R^3Now, - f'(x)(x) = - f(x) by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, leaving: \int_{0}^{x} f' (t)\,dt \ = \ - f
  • #1
sponsoredwalk
533
5
Hello, I know how to rederive & prove Taylor's Formula as being a simple application
of Integration By Parts to ∫f'(x) dx = f(b) - f(a) leading to

f(b) = f(a) + f'(a)(b - a) + ½f''(a)(b - a)² + ... + Rⁿ

and that we can approximate f(x) by setting a = 0 & b = x

f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + ½f''(0)x² + ... + Rⁿ

and I understand that Rⁿ lies between the lower & upper bound, i.e.
∃ c ∈ (a,b) : f ⁿ (c)(b - a)ⁿ/n! = Rⁿ
& f ⁿ (c)(b - a)ⁿ/n! = Rⁿ

but I'm confused on how to apply all of this.

For example, f(x) = sinx

okay, I can create the taylor polynomial

sinx = x - x³/3! + x^5/5! - ... + Rⁿ

and the question is compute sin(0.1) to 3 decimals.

Well
a = 0,
x = 0 + 0.1 = 0.1

If I compute it to 3 decimals I get

sin(0.1) = (0.1) - (0.1)³/3! + (0.1)^5/5! = 0.099...

Would this be the 3 decimals? Like, this is not correct at all compared to my calculator's answer for sin(0.1).
the way the book has done it has me really confused.
When I add the error on I get no significant change,
I'm confused as to what the point of the formula is here.

I used my calculator for this btw (isn't this equation supposed to do away with calculators? ) ?

Now, my book has done something very different & I don't understand.
(Serge Lang: A First Course in Calculus - page 309)

Lang ignores calculating the Rⁿ term, and hasn't shown me how to get it yet, but
uses the sin/cosine natural upper bound of 1, so Rⁿ ≤ Mⁿ|xⁿ|/n!
where Mⁿ = 1 as an upper bound.

(As a side note, this comes from the proof that ∃ c ∈ (a,b) : f ⁿ (c)(b - a)ⁿ/n!
where he's chosen f ⁿ (v)(b - a)ⁿ/n! = Mⁿ = 1, i.e. v being the maximum,
is the logic correct or am I missing something? He's just squeezing in Rⁿ underneath)With this he just calculates
Rⁿ ≤ Mⁿ|xⁿ|/n! -----------> Rⁿ ≤ 1|(0.1)³|/3!
Rⁿ ≤ (0.001)/6

Now, he says that "such accuracy would put us in the required range of accuracy.
Hence we can just use the first term of Taylor's formula."

sin(0.1) = 0.100 ± (0.001)/6

I have no idea how or why he just did all that, non whatsoever...

I don't understand how I could get an incorrect answer by using the x/3! & x/5!
because the added values are supposed to give a better approximation, not a
worse one

Edit: Thinking about it I can use linear approximation:

f(x) = f(x₀) + f'(x₀)(x - x₀)
f(x) = sin(0) + cos(0)(x - 0)
f(x) = x
sin(0.1) = 0.100

and then use the error function thing but it seems to come out of nowhere, i.e. I made it up &
while it's good to have that backup I'm trying to learn how to get this thing right :p

Another Edit: I think I got it

sin(0.1) = sin(0) + cos(0)•(0.1) - sin(0)•(0.1)² /2 - cos(0)•(0.1)³/6 = 0 + 0.1 - 0 - (0.001)/6

Now, 0.001/6 would be around the third decimal place & that's what the question asked for.

I think that's right, please let me know as it seems correct :D
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sponsoredwalk said:
sinx = x - x³/3! + x^5/5! - ... + Rⁿ

and the question is compute sin(0.1) to 3 decimals.

Well
a = 0,
x = 0 + 0.1 = 0.1

If I compute it to 3 decimals I get

sin(0.1) = (0.1) - (0.1)³/3! + (0.1)^5/5! = 0.099...

Would this be the 3 decimals? Like, this is not correct at all compared to my calculator's answer for sin(0.1).

Your calculator is in degree mode, switch it to radians (or Rad as it often is on calculators,) my calculator gives

[tex]\sin (0.1)\appox 0.001745328366[/tex] in degree mode​

and

[tex]\sin (0.1)\appox 0.99833416647[/tex] in radian mode​

also, your calculation of sin(0.1) = (0.1) - (0.1)³/3! + (0.1)^5/5! = 0.099...

is, well

[tex]\sin (0.1)\appox 0.1 - \frac{(0.1)^3}{3!}+\frac{(0.1)^5}{5!}=0.99833416667[/tex]​

accurate to ten decimal places! A bit too accurate. The first step in the solution to this problem is part that you didn't understand in the book: The proper value of n is what you want to know firs. Beginning with the formula

[tex]R_{n}(x)\leq M_{n} \frac{x^n}{n!}[/tex]​

where [itex]R_{n}(x)[/itex] is the remainder term after calculating n terms of the Taylor series, and [itex]\left| f^{(n)}(x)\right| \leq M_{n}[/itex]. To determine the value of n from the formula (how many terms to calculate in the series to achieve the desired 3 decimal place accuracy) use the bounds of the nth derivative of the function, namely

[tex]\left| \frac{d^n}{dx^n}\sin x \right| \leq 1 =: M[/tex]​

and the required accuracy, which is 3 decimal places so we want [itex]R_{n}(0.1)< 0.001,[/itex] hence we require that

[tex]0.001\leq 1\cdot \frac{(0.1)^n}{n!}[/tex]​

work out the values of the right-hand side for n=1,2, and 3 to see that n=3 is the proper value, now compute the value of the third Taylor polynomial at x=0,1 to get the estimate


[tex]\sin (0.1)\appox 0.1 - \frac{(0.1)^3}{3!}+\frac{(0.1)^5}{5!}=0.99833416667[/tex]​

the first equation we solved tells us that even though we at ten place accuracy, no lesser amount of terms would give the desired accuracy.
 
  • #3
Hey thanks for taking the time to write such an in-depth reply but I'm still a little confused.

I've rewritten out all of my knowledge on this topic to make sure I'm not confused, the
rest of this post will just be the proofs & I'll post another post straight after with my confusion.

Using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus:

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} f ' (t)\,dt \ = \ f(b) \ - \ f(a) [/itex]

We'll rewrite this in integration by part form:

[itex] u \ = \ f'(t) \ , \ du \ = \ f''(t) dt \ ,\ dv \ = \ dt \ , \ v \ = \ - (b - t) [/itex]

(The "v" term includes the minus due to a chain rule differentiation removing it anyway! Very sneaky thing that confused me for a few minutes but I like it! :D).

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} u dv \ = \ u v |^b_a \ - \ \int_{a}^{b} v du [/itex]

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} f ' (t)\,dt \ = \ - f'(t)(b \ - \ t) |^b_a \ - \ \int_{a}^{b} - f''(t)(b \ - \ a)dt [/itex]

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} f ' (t)\,dt \ = \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ + \ \int_{a}^{b} f''(t)(b \ - \ a)dt [/itex]

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} f ' (t)\,dt \ = \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ - \ f''(t)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2} |^b_a \ - \ \int_{a}^{b} - f'''(t)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2}dt [/itex]

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} f ' (t)\,dt \ = \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ + \ f''(a)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2} \ + \ \int_{a}^{b} f'''(t)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2}dt [/itex]

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} f ' (t)\,dt \ = \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ + \ f''(a)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2} \ + \ \int_{a}^{b} f'''(t)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2}dt [/itex]

Okay, before I go on I'd like to qualify that the left hand side can be
rewritten as

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} f ' (t)\,dt \ = \ f(b) \ - \ f(a) [/itex]

so that the above becomes

[itex] \ f(b) \ - \ f(a) \ = \ \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ + \ f''(a)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2} \ + \ \int_{a}^{b} f'''(t)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2}dt [/itex]

or better yet:

[itex] \ f(b) \ = \ f(a) \ + \ \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ + \ f''(a)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2} \ + \ \int_{a}^{b} f'''(t)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2}dt [/itex]

Okay, well you'd keep going with the right hand term until you've
calculated the (n - 1) term & then you want the "n"th term

[itex] \ f(b) \ = \ f(a) \ + \ \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ + \ f''(a)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2} \ + ... \ + \ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} \ f^n (t) dt [/itex]

[itex] \ f(b) \ = \ f(a) \ + \ \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ + \ f''(a)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2} \ + ... \ - \ \ f^n (t) \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n )!}^{(n)} |^b_a \ - \ \ f^{(n + 1)}(t) dt \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n )!}^{(n)} [/itex]

[itex] \ f(b) \ = \ f(a) \ + \ \ f'(a)(b \ - \ a) \ + \ f''(a)\frac{(b \ - \ a)^2}{2} \ + ... \ + \ f^n (a) \frac{(b \ - \ a)}{(n )!}^{(n)} \ + \ \int_{a}^{b} \ f^{(n + 1)}(t) \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n )!}^{(n)} dt [/itex]

Alright, I think all of that is right. My old calculus book gave some
horrendous proof that I don't think anyone would bother memorizing
but this one just falls out of combining I.B.P. with the F.T.C.

As for the proof that

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} \ f^n (t) dt \ = \ \frac{f^n(c)}{n!}(b \ - \ a)^n[/itex]

[itex] f^n(u) \ = \ m \ \le \ M \ = \ f^n(v) \ [/itex]

These are constants and we'll squeeze the integral in between them[itex] m \ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} \ dt \ \le \ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} \ f^n (t) dt \ \le \ M \ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} \ dt[/itex]

[itex] m \ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} dt \ \le \ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} \ f^n (t) dt \ \le \ M \ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} dt[/itex]

[itex] \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} f^n (u) dt \ \le \ R_n \ \le \ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{(b \ - \ t)}{(n \ - \ 1)!}^{(n - 1)} f^n (v) dt[/itex]

[itex] \frac{(b \ - \ a)}{n!}^{n} f^n (u) \ \le \ R_n \ \le \ \frac{(b \ - \ a)}{n!}^{n} f^n (v) [/itex]

So, by the Intermediate Value Theorem ∃ c ∈ (a,b) : [itex] \frac{f^n(c)}{n!}(b \ - \ a)^n[/itex]

I'm wondering, is there a way to find this "c" numerically because
neither of the two books I've looked in give you a way to find this?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I hope you see how easy & intuitive all of this is, well as for the rest of the
way the chapter goes it's quite confusing.

There's a theorem that says

If ∃ [itex] M_n [/itex] : [itex] | f^n(x) | \ \le \ M_n[/itex] then

[itex] | \frac{f^n(c)}{n!}(b \ - \ a)^n | \le \ \frac{M_n|b - a|^n}{n!}[/itex]

I don't even know what this means, I think it means that if there is a
number such that the "n"th derivative is less than this number then
it's less than the right hand side.

Furthermore, I don't know how to use this in practice :(
The following bits of the chapter all rely on this specific concept & I
can't advance until I get it.

Example, compute sin(0.1) to three decimals.

sin(0.1) ≈ sin(0) + cos(0)•(0.1) - sin(0)•(0.1)²/2 - cos(0)•(0.1)³/6 + sin(0)•(0.1)⁴/24 + cos(0)•(0.1)⁵/120 - sin(0)•(0.1)^6/6! - ...

sin(0.1) ≈ 0 + 0.1 - 0 - (0.1)³/6 + 0 + (0.1)⁵/120 - 0 - ...

sin(0.1) ≈ 0 + 0.1 - 0 - (0.1)³/6 + 0 + (0.1)⁵/120 - 0 - ...

sin(0.1) ≈ 0 + 0.1 - 0 - 0.001/6 + 0 + 0.00001/120 - 0 - ...

sin(0.1) ≈ 0.1 - 0.001/6 + 0.00001/120 - ...

That would give you accuracy to 3 decimal places but I don't see
how the "error" function thing even fits in here or is needed?
If you know, how would I find "c" in this particular example?

Oh, and you've written

[tex]
\sin (0.1)\appox 0.1 - \frac{(0.1)^3}{3!}+\frac{(0.1)^5}{5!}=0.9983341666 7
[/tex]

at the end of your post, but I see you forgot a space in the \sin (0.1)\appox 0.1 term :tongue:

[tex]
\sin (0.1) \appox 0.1 - \frac{(0.1)^3}{3!}+\frac{(0.1)^5}{5!}=0.9983341666 7
[/tex]

I was confused just until right now where I clicked on it & quoted it :tongue2: NVM!
 
  • #5
Alright, I think I've got it but there's still a lot of questions...

If you look at the proof in the second post I have a [itex]M_n[/itex] term.
That represents the maximum value on the interval & I think the
formula is saying that you take the maximum possible value of the
"n"th derivative on the interval you're evaluating and you can safely
assume that to be an upper bound.

Because it's a trigonometric function we have a bound of 1 so we
can safely set [itex]M_n \ = \ 1[/itex]

Now, if I am to use the error term in the specific example I gave
I need to find a value of "n" so that I come out with 3 decimal
places of error. 3 seems like a good term! This is kind of a trial-&-error
aspect of the whole process right?

Anyway, if I do this then I'm fine for my example but I have a further
question, how are you supposed to deal with this in general?

If you have a strange polynomial function with lots of curves in
the interval how do you find as suitable [itex]M_n[/itex] ?
Do you just use the normal calculus process of finding max & min
on this separate term?

Is it not just a hell of a lot easier to determine the "c" term & use that?
 

1. What is Taylor's Formula?

Taylor's Formula, also known as Taylor's Theorem, is a mathematical formula used to approximate a function with a polynomial. It states that a function can be expressed as an infinite sum of its derivatives evaluated at a single point, known as the Taylor Series.

2. When is Taylor's Formula used?

Taylor's Formula is used primarily in calculus and numerical analysis. It is used to approximate a function when the exact value cannot be determined or when a simpler form is needed for calculations.

3. How is Taylor's Formula calculated?

The formula is calculated by taking the derivatives of a function at a given point and plugging them into the Taylor Series. The series is then truncated at a certain point to create an approximation of the function.

4. What is the significance of Taylor's Formula?

Taylor's Formula is significant in mathematics because it allows for the approximation of complex functions with simpler polynomials. It also plays a key role in the development of calculus and is used in a wide range of applications, such as engineering, physics, and economics.

5. What are some real-world applications of Taylor's Formula?

Some real-world applications of Taylor's Formula include using it to approximate the value of a function in physics equations, such as in the motion of a pendulum. It is also used in finance to estimate the value of a derivative or option. In computer graphics, it is used to create smooth curves and surfaces. Additionally, it is used in signal processing to filter out noise from a signal.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
990
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
957
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
549
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
571
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
288
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
287
Back
Top