Technichal drawing legend markings question

  • Thread starter Thread starter predatorkind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drawing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a technical drawing of an AK-47 with parts marked by numbers, but the meanings of the letters 'V' and 'T' next to some numbers are unclear. Participants express frustration over the lack of a comprehensive legend accompanying the diagram. It is noted that there is no universal standard for such markings in technical drawings. Suggestions include finding the original source of the drawing, asking on firearms forums, or consulting a gun dealer for clarification. The conversation highlights the importance of clear labeling in technical diagrams.
predatorkind
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello

I hope this is the right forum to ask the question: I have this diagram of ak47 with the rifle parts marked. They are all numbered and listed in the legend of the diagram. I can not quite figure out what the letters 'V' and 'T' next to some of the numbers are supposed to stand for.

I would appreciate any clarification.
 

Attachments

  • AK47_Body_Diagram_500.jpg
    AK47_Body_Diagram_500.jpg
    65.6 KB · Views: 591
Engineering news on Phys.org
Whoever created the diagram should have supplied a legend defining the numbering scheme.
 
pantaz said:
Whoever created the diagram should have supplied a legend defining the numbering scheme.

pantaz, we know that!

bump! :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
pantaz, we know that!

*sigh* I suppose I should have been more verbose.

To the best of my knowledge, there is no general technical drawing "standard" for such a thing.

My first choice would be to locate the source of the drawing/list. Second, post the question on a firearms forum. Third, print the image and take it to a gun dealer.
 

Thread 'Query on Isentropic relationships (such as PV^gamma = constant)'

Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
View full post »

Thread 'Dry sump pump issue'

I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
View full post »

Similar threads

Drawing diagrams in physics is so difficult for me!
Replies
13
Views
3K
Question re electrochemical marking of stainless steel
Replies
6
Views
2K
Engineering Use voltage nodal analysis to solve for the current flowing in this AC circuit
Replies
2
Views
2K
Challenge: Find the minimum amount of draws possible for a list of integers
Replies
9
Views
2K
Finding the distance of a peg so that a pendulum can circle around it
Replies
2
Views
881
Sound Wave Interference and Finding the Path Differences with Diagrams
Replies
20
Views
5K
Heat Exchanger Design - Can anyone identify these drawings?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Gamma - A Minkowski Spacetime Diagram Generator
Replies
5
Views
2K
Frontier Molecular Orbital Theory Problem
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Three inertial particles: Separating the twins from the paradox
Replies
40
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top