TEM mode propagation between 2 infinite conductor plates

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


I am trying to solve a problem from Jackson's book (in chapter 8). I must describe the propagation of a TEM mode through a transmission line that consists of two infinite conductor plates that are parallel to each other and separated by a distance a. There's a dielectric between the 2 plates.

At first I did not know how to start the problem. Maybe solve the wave equation with boundary conditions that ##\vec E## must be perpendicular to the conductor surfaces and ##\vec B## must be parallel to it and both fields should have no component in the z direction, the direction of propagation. On the top of this, since it's a TEM, Jackson's demonstrate that in a hollow cylinder the fact that ##E_z## and ##B_z## vanish implies that these fields satisfy electrostatics Maxwell equations and I believe it is also the case for the exercise I'm dealing with. This is also confirmed by page 14 of http://www.ece.msstate.edu/~donohoe/ece4333notes3.pdf for the particular set up I'm facing in this problem.

Homework Equations


Not sure...

The Attempt at a Solution


Following the document linked above I reach that ##\vec E=-\frac{V}{d}e^{-ikz}\hat y## and ##\vec H=\sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mu}}\frac{V}{a}e^{-ikz}\hat x##.
So I see no propagation, no time dependence... However in the document I linked above one read
The current directions in the two plates correspond to the direction of propagation assumed for the waves.
which confuses me even more. How come there is a current in the plates? They seemed to act like a capacitor to me and as far as I know there is no current in the plates... What I am missing?

I've also found another solution to the problem but it did not convince me since the guy assumes time dependence of the fields and for some unknown reason to me, he assumes from the start that the current in the plates if of the form ##\vec K=(z,t)=K_0\mu e^{i(kz-\omega t)}\hat x##. See http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pran/jackson/P506/P506W02HW02.pdf.

So which answer is correct? Thank you.
 
Still stuck at the very same point in this problem. I don't know which solution is correct and whether there is some time dependence on the fields.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top