Temperature change in ice water interface

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the thermal interactions between a metal block at 500 K and a large ice slab at 273 K, particularly focusing on the temperature changes at the ice-water interface as the block sinks into the ice. Participants explore concepts related to phase equilibrium, latent heat of fusion, and heat transfer dynamics in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the water in contact with the ice does not change its temperature while the metal block sinks, as the ice maintains the water at 273 K due to phase equilibrium.
  • Others argue that the heat transfer from the metal block to the ice is primarily to provide the latent heat of fusion, suggesting that the water remains at 273 K during this process.
  • A later reply questions the assumption that the water cannot change its temperature until it is in contact with ice, seeking clarification on how the hot metal block affects the water's temperature.
  • It is suggested that the metal block melts a thin layer of water, which allows it to sink, and that there is a temperature difference driving heat transfer between the metal and the ice.
  • Some participants emphasize that the layer of water between the metal and ice has a temperature gradient, leading to heat flow within the water, despite the ice remaining at 273 K.
  • There is a discussion about the mass flow of ice into the interface layer and the corresponding mass flow of water out, indicating a dynamic interaction at the ice-water boundary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the temperature behavior of water in contact with ice and the heat transfer dynamics involved. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the exact mechanisms at play.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of heat transfer processes, including the role of latent heat and phase changes, but do not reach a definitive conclusion on the interactions between the metal block, ice, and water.

Elena14
Messages
52
Reaction score
1
A metal block at 500 K is kept on a large ice slab at 273 K.The metal block completely sinks inside the ice slab. I was told that the water in contact with ice would not change its temperature while the block sinks down and hence the "only" heat transfer from the metal block to ice slab will occur to provide for the latent heat of fusion. Why would not the water in contact with ice change its temperature?
I understand that the block would start to sink as soon as the ice at 273 K converts to water at 273 K. But is it correct to say that the water in contact cannot change its temperature until it is in contact with ice?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Elena14 said:
The metal block completely sinks inside the metal cube.
In the ice cube, I should hope ?
Elena14 said:
Why would not the water in contact with ice change its temperature?
The ice keeps the water at 273 K. At that temperature ice and water are in phase equilibrium: add heat ##\Rightarrow## ice melts; remove heat ##\Rightarrow## water freezes.
Elena14 said:
But is it correct to say that the water in contact cannot change its temperature until it is in contact with ice?
Don't understand the question. In contact with the metal ? Change the temperature from what to what ?
 
BvU said:
In the ice cube, I should hope ?The ice keeps the water at 273 K. At that temperature ice and water are in phase equilibrium: add heat ##\Rightarrow## ice melts; remove heat ##\Rightarrow## water freezes.
Don't understand the question. In contact with the metal ? Change the temperature from what to what ?

By changing the temperature I mean the effect the hot metal block will have on water.
How will the ice keep the water at 273 K
 
By melting !
 
Why will it melt? What will provide it latent heat of fusion to do that?
 
If the water warms up above 273 K the heat is taken away by the ice: it melts.
 
The metal melts a very thin layer of water (*). The weight of the metal pushes the water to the sides where it can escape upwards, thus allowing the metal block to sink into the ice.

(*) That thin layer of water is in contact with the metal topside and with the ice on the bottom side. So there is a temperature difference that drives downward heat transfer.
 
The metal block would convert the ice at 273 K to water at 273 K and make its way to the bottom. And since the water so converted is at 273 K and the ice is also at 273 K there will be no heat flow. When the metal block reaches bottom, it has no more heat left and it is also at 273 K, and hence the heat transfer would stop. But while the metal block is inside the ice cube, it will be in contact with water it had just converted as well as ice at the same time but it will provide the latent heat of fusion to ice to convert it to water at 273 and not provide more heat to water. Correct me if I am wrong?
 
Elena14 said:
The metal block would convert the ice at 273 K to water at 273 K and make its way to the bottom. And since the water so converted is at 273 K and the ice is also at 273 K there will be no heat flow. When the metal block reaches bottom, it has no more heat left and it is also at 273 K, and hence the heat transfer would stop. But while the metal block is inside the ice cube, it will be in contact with water it had just converted as well as ice at the same time but it will provide the latent heat of fusion to ice to convert it to water at 273 and not provide more heat to water. Correct me if I am wrong?
To re-state and amplify what BvU has said...
The layer of water between metal and ice has non-zero thickness. There is a temperature gradient within the water and a corresponding heat flow.

Consider an even thinner layer surrounding the current water/ice interface. This region moves over time. There is a mass flow of 273 K ice into this interface layer. There is a mass flow of 273 K water out of this interface layer. There can be no temperature gradient in the ice -- it is already at 273 K. It cannot become warmer without melting. Accordingly, there is no heat flow within the ice at the boundary of this interface layer. There is a temperature gradient within the water and a corresponding heat flow within the water into this interface layer.

The rate of of heat flow into the water/ice interface region will correspond to the mass flow rate times the latent heat of fusion per unit mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
26K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K