Temperature coefficient of resistance - size effects vs bulk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the temperature coefficient of resistivity (alpha) and its potential dependence on the size of resistors, particularly as dimensions shrink to the nanoscale. While alpha is generally considered a material constant independent of dimensions, some literature suggests that surface effects and electron scattering may influence alpha in smaller resistors. A referenced article indicates that resistivity is affected by surface roughness in thin films, but it does not confirm a significant temperature coefficient effect due to thickness. The conversation highlights the complexity of how physical dimensions might impact alpha, suggesting further investigation is warranted. Overall, the relationship between resistor size and alpha remains a nuanced topic requiring more research.
Hyo X
Messages
101
Reaction score
11
I am looking for a reference to discuss the effects of resistor size on alpha, the temperature coefficient of resistivity.
If we use the linear R=R0*(1+alpha*(T-T0))
alpha is a material constant, presumably for bulk-type resistors. Will alpha change as size (cross sectional area) of the resistor shrinks to tens of nanometers in one dimension? any reference on this? thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Alpha is a material constant that is independent of the dimensions.
 
Baluncore said:
Alpha is a material constant that is independent of the dimensions.

I concluded something different, based on literature.

http://iopscience.iop.org/1347-4065/9/11/1326there is also the fuchs-sondheimer theory but i don't think it dicusses alpha
 
I cannot access that article because it is behind a pay-wall.

The abstract refers to resistivity as being determined by surface roughness in thin films. I would interpret that as a “virtual thickness” parameter, not as a change in the bulk material resistivity.

Although the abstract mentions the temp-co was also studied, it reveals no temp-co effect due to thickness. That might suggest that there was no significant effect on alpha observed.
 
I can't attest to the quality of the article but it has the suggestion that alpha may have some dependence on the physical dimensions of the sample.

I think a difference in the effect of surfaces and grains on the scattering of electrons and scattering or localization of phonons could conceivably contribute to changes in alpha as a function of surface:volume ratio or some other size parameter.

for completeness, from the article
Here h is the amplitude of oscilations describing the surface roughness and lambda is the mean-free-path of electrons.
Alpha-thickness.png

definition%20of%20h.png

if you are really interested in the article let me know and i can send you a dropbox link or something
 
Back
Top