Temperature Conversions: Jekyll and Hyde Scale Comparison

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting temperatures between the Jekyll and Hyde scales, where water freezes at 17 degrees J and 0 degrees oH, and boils at 97 degrees J and 120 degrees oH. The relationship between the two scales is established through the formula J(H) = H[(97-17)/120] + 17, indicating a linear conversion. The freezing point confirms that J(0) equals 17, while the boiling point confirms J(120) equals 97, validating the derived formula. Participants explore the mathematical approach to solving the conversion, emphasizing the linearity assumption of the scales. The conversation highlights the importance of establishing a reliable formula for accurate temperature conversions.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



On a new Jekyll temperature scale, water freezes at 17 degree(s) J and boils at 97 degree(s) J. On another new temperature scale, the Hyde scale, water freezes at 0 degree(s) oH and boils at 120 degree(s) oH. If methyl alcohol boils at 84 oH, what is its boiling point on the Jekyll scale?

Homework Equations



Jekyll has a FP 17 degrees higher than the Hyde scale.

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright. Freezing point on Jekyll is 17 degrees higher than it is on Hyde.

Therefore, any formula relating J and H must have the general form of:

J(H) = H + 17, where H = 0.

The general formula is:

J(H) = H[(97-17)/120] + 17

Checking my work:

H = 0, J = 17. Correct.

H = 120. J = 97. Correct.

What are some good ways of tackling this problem? Why does subtracting two points on the Jekyll scale divided by subtracting the two points on the Hyde scale multiplied by H work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best way is to tackle this mathematically.

You are looking for a formula of the form
$$
J(H) = a H + b
$$
(i.e., assuming that the two scales are linear).

You then have
$$
J(0) = 17 = a \times 0 +b
$$
and
$$
J(120) = 97 = a \times 120 + b
$$
or, in other words, two equations with two unknowns. The first is easily solved for ##b = 17##, which allows you to solve the second for ##a##.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top