Tensor equation in Dirac's 1975 book

  • Thread starter Thread starter exmarine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Tensor
exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
Dirac has equation 3.4 as:

x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=g^{\lambda}_{\nu}

Shouldn't that have a 4 on the right side?

x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=(4?)g^{\lambda}_{\nu}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
exmarine said:
Dirac has equation 3.4 as:

x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=g^{\lambda}_{\nu}

Shouldn't that have a 4 on the right side?

x^{\lambda}_{,\mu}x^{\mu}_{,\nu}=(4?)g^{\lambda}_{\nu}

Nope. let me open the expression for you


\Sigma _ \mu \frac{\partial x^ \lambda}{\partial x ^ \mu} \frac{\partial x^ \mu}{\partial x ^ \nu}=\delta ^ \lambda _ \nu = g ^ \lambda _ \nu
 
Let me open it some more

<br /> \Sigma _ \mu \frac{\partial x^ \lambda}{\partial x ^ \mu} \frac{\partial x^ \mu}{\partial x ^ \nu}=\Sigma _ \mu \delta ^ \lambda _ \mu \delta ^ \mu _ \nu =\delta ^ \lambda _ \nu = g ^ \lambda _ \nu
 
? Wouldn't the first term, for example, be:

\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{0&#039;}}\frac{\partial x^{0&#039;}}{\partial x^{0}}+\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{1&#039;}}\frac{\partial x^{1&#039;}}{\partial x^{0}}+\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{2&#039;}}\frac{\partial x^{2&#039;}}{\partial x^{0}}+\frac{\partial x^{0}}{\partial x^{3&#039;}}\frac{\partial x^{3&#039;}}{\partial x^{0}}=4?

And all the off-diagonals be 0 of course.
 
Consider the special case of the identity transformation, where all the new coordinates are the same as the old ones. That is, x0' = x0, x1' = x1, x2' = x2, and x3' = x3. Plug this into your equation, and I think you'll see that the result is 1, not 4.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top