A Tensor product in Cartesian coordinates

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
I am confused. Why sometimes perturbation ##V'=\alpha xy## we can write as ##V'=\alpha x \otimes y##. I am confused because ##\otimes## is a tensor product and ##x## and ##y## are not matrices in coordinate representation. Can someone explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To explain this we need more context, i.e., which concrete example are you discussing?
 
LagrangeEuler said:
##x## and ##y## are not matrices in coordinate representation.
But they are matrices in any other representation, e.g. momentum representation. And even in coordinate representation they can be viewed as matrices, but in this representation calculations can be simplified by viewing them as ordinary numbers.
 
vanhees71 said:
To explain this we need more context, i.e., which concrete example are you discussing?
For instance 2d linear harmonic oscillator with this perturbation.
 
I'm confused by your confusion.

A 1d quantum system "lives" in a Hilbert space ##\mathcal{H}_{x}## that is spanned by linear combination of base kets of the form ##\left|x\right\rangle##. You can also have another independent degree of freedom living in a Hilbert space ##\mathcal{H}_{y} ## with base kets of the form ##\left|y\right\rangle ##. Then, you can combine both degrees of freedom into a Hilbert space ##\mathcal{H}_{xy}=\mathcal{H}_{x}\otimes\mathcal{H}_{y}##, that is how the Hilbert space of a 2d quantum system is build. The base kets are of the form ##\left|xy\right\rangle \equiv\left|x\right\rangle \otimes\left|y\right\rangle ##

So ##V'=\alpha xy## is always a shorthand for ##V'=\alpha x \otimes y##, because that's how the operators acting on the Hilbert space of 2d quantum systems are build, by definition.

See Cohen-Tannoudji, quantum mechanics, vol 1, page 160.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
597
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top