Terminal velocity in finite time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation for terminal velocity, v^2 = (mg/k)(1 - e^{-2ky/m}), highlighting that a raindrop reaches its terminal velocity in finite time due to various factors. Participants question what these factors are, noting that drag force is the primary decelerating force, while k, which depends on the raindrop's geometry and fluid density, may fluctuate during the fall. There is a suggestion that these fluctuations in k could significantly affect the raindrop's velocity. The conversation also references approximations made about air resistance, indicating a deeper exploration of the dynamics involved. Overall, the discussion seeks to clarify the complexities influencing terminal velocity beyond simple drag calculations.
cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
v^2 = \frac{mg}{k}(1 - e^{-2ky/m})

As t \rightarrow \infty and y \rightarrow \infty we see TV = \sqrt{mg/k}

And below my book reads: "From actual experience we know that a raindrop reaches its limiting velocity in a finite and not an infinite amount of time. This is because other factors also operate to slow the raindrop's velocity."

What are these factors? o:)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what he would mean by this. The drag force is what's slowing down the raindrop, so friction can't be an answer. K depends on the geometry of the raindrop and the fluid. The K should change a small amount as the density of the fluid increases as the raindrop gets lower. But appart from that, I don't know. Maybe Clausius can tell us why.
 
Maybe the passage means that the fluctuations in the value of k as the object falls change the velocity more than the difference between v and vt
 
dav2008 said:
Maybe the passage means that the fluctuations in the value of k as the object falls change the velocity more than the difference between v and vt

I think you're right because before he states some approximations so that air resistance is R = kv.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
704
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top