Testing to see if the vector field could be a magnetic field.

Michael 37
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By considering its divergence, test whether the following vector field could be a magnetic field:
F=(a/r) cos∅ r Where a is constant. NOTE( the 'r' has the hat symbol ontop if it, unit vector i think)

Homework Equations



You may use that is cylindrical co-ordinates:
∇.F=(1/r)∂/∂r(rFr) + (1/r)∂F∅/∂∅ + ∂Fz/∂z

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to differentiate F with repect to r but the 'rFr' threw me! Then differentiating with respect to ∅ then z. But I still don't understand what they want me to test. I am lacking not only in the mathematical side to the question but also the theory. Please help, been at it for days!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Michael 37 said:

Homework Statement



By considering its divergence, test whether the following vector field could be a magnetic field:
F=(a/r) cos∅ r Where a is constant. NOTE( the 'r' has the hat symbol ontop if it, unit vector i think)

Homework Equations



You may use that is cylindrical co-ordinates:
∇.F=(1/r)∂/∂r(rFr) + (1/r)∂F∅/∂∅ + ∂Fz/∂z

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to differentiate F with repect to r but the 'rFr' threw me! Then differentiating with respect to ∅ then z. But I still don't understand what they want me to test. I am lacking not only in the mathematical side to the question but also the theory. Please help, been at it for days!

Magnetic fields are divergence-free (recall the Maxwell equation \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0), so if \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} \neq 0 then \mathbf{F} cannot be a magnetic field. But if \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} = 0 then it could.

\mathbf{F} \equiv<br /> F_r\,\hat{\mathbf{r}} + F_\phi\,\hat{\mathbf{\phi}} + F_z\,\hat{\mathbf{z}}<br /> = \frac ar \cos \phi\,\hat{\mathbf{r}}

To determine \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} you must first determine the components of \mathbf{F}. The unit vectors are orthogonal, so F_r = \mathbf{F} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} etc. We see then that F_\phi = F_z = 0 and
<br /> F_r = \frac {a \cos \phi}r.<br />
 
Is the reason for Fϕ=Fz=0 because in the F function, there are no ∅ or z components?

So now all that is left is Fr = (a/r) cos ∅ so do i need the divergence of that (in other words do i differentiate that with respect to r?) And if it = 0, it may be a magnetic field and if it doesn't = 0 it can't be a magnetic field?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top