Testing to see if the vector field could be a magnetic field.

AI Thread Summary
To determine if the vector field F=(a/r) cos∅ r could represent a magnetic field, one must check its divergence, as magnetic fields are divergence-free (∇·B = 0). The components of F in cylindrical coordinates reveal that Fϕ and Fz are zero, simplifying the divergence calculation to just F_r = (a/r) cos ∅. The user is confused about how to differentiate and apply the divergence formula correctly. If the calculated divergence equals zero, then F could be a magnetic field; if not, it cannot be. Understanding the mathematical and theoretical aspects of divergence is crucial for solving this problem.
Michael 37
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By considering its divergence, test whether the following vector field could be a magnetic field:
F=(a/r) cos∅ r Where a is constant. NOTE( the 'r' has the hat symbol ontop if it, unit vector i think)

Homework Equations



You may use that is cylindrical co-ordinates:
∇.F=(1/r)∂/∂r(rFr) + (1/r)∂F∅/∂∅ + ∂Fz/∂z

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to differentiate F with repect to r but the 'rFr' threw me! Then differentiating with respect to ∅ then z. But I still don't understand what they want me to test. I am lacking not only in the mathematical side to the question but also the theory. Please help, been at it for days!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Michael 37 said:

Homework Statement



By considering its divergence, test whether the following vector field could be a magnetic field:
F=(a/r) cos∅ r Where a is constant. NOTE( the 'r' has the hat symbol ontop if it, unit vector i think)

Homework Equations



You may use that is cylindrical co-ordinates:
∇.F=(1/r)∂/∂r(rFr) + (1/r)∂F∅/∂∅ + ∂Fz/∂z

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to differentiate F with repect to r but the 'rFr' threw me! Then differentiating with respect to ∅ then z. But I still don't understand what they want me to test. I am lacking not only in the mathematical side to the question but also the theory. Please help, been at it for days!

Magnetic fields are divergence-free (recall the Maxwell equation \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0), so if \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} \neq 0 then \mathbf{F} cannot be a magnetic field. But if \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} = 0 then it could.

\mathbf{F} \equiv<br /> F_r\,\hat{\mathbf{r}} + F_\phi\,\hat{\mathbf{\phi}} + F_z\,\hat{\mathbf{z}}<br /> = \frac ar \cos \phi\,\hat{\mathbf{r}}

To determine \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} you must first determine the components of \mathbf{F}. The unit vectors are orthogonal, so F_r = \mathbf{F} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} etc. We see then that F_\phi = F_z = 0 and
<br /> F_r = \frac {a \cos \phi}r.<br />
 
Is the reason for Fϕ=Fz=0 because in the F function, there are no ∅ or z components?

So now all that is left is Fr = (a/r) cos ∅ so do i need the divergence of that (in other words do i differentiate that with respect to r?) And if it = 0, it may be a magnetic field and if it doesn't = 0 it can't be a magnetic field?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top