Textbook question on power series

Swatch
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
My textbook has an example on multiplication of power series.
" Multiply the geometric series [tex]x^n[/tex] by itself to get a power series for [tex]1/(1-x)^2[/tex] for |x|<1 "
from this we get the [tex]c_{n}[/tex]=n+1
O.K. I get that the coefficients are 1 for all n but why +1.
Could someone please explain this to me if possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to multiply [tex](1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + ...)(1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + ...)[/tex], so just try few examples first to see what's going on. The [tex]x^0[/tex] term is just [tex]1*1 = 1[/tex], the [tex]x^1[/tex] term is [tex]x*1+1*x = 2x[/tex], the [tex]x^2[/tex] term is [tex]x^2*1 + x*x + 1*x^2 = 3x^2[/tex], and the [tex]x^3[/tex] is [tex]x^3*1 + x^2*x+x*x^2+1*x^3 =4x^3[/tex]. Now, can you begin to see a pattern forming?

Alternatively, you can just apply the formula for the coeffecients of the product series in terms of the coeffecients of the two original series. It looks something like [tex]c_k = \sum^k_{r=0} a_r b_{k-r}[/tex] where the a's and b's are the coeffecients of the original series, and the c's are coeffecients of the product series.
 
Last edited:
Right call Physics Monkey:
The formula for the Cauchy product of series as it is presented in this http://mwt.e-technik.uni-ulm.de/world/lehre/basic_mathematics/di/node14.php3 .
A quick version is:
Suppose [itex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n[/itex] and [itex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n[/itex] converge absolutely. Then
[tex]\left( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n\right) \left( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n\right) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} a_{k}b_{n-k}[/tex] also converges absolutely.
Alternately, look here, under the heading A Variant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
O.K. I see what's going on now, thanks. But I still don't get how to get n+1 from [tex]c_k = \sum^k_{r=0} a_r b_{k-r}[/tex] without doing some multiplication. Please explain to me if you can.
 
the answer to you above question

Using

[tex]\left( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n\right) \left( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n\right) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} a_{k}b_{n-k}[/tex]

we have

[tex]\left( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^n\right) \left( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^n\right) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k}x^{n-k} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k+(n-k)} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n} \sum_{k=0}^{n} 1 = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+1) x^{n}[/tex]

where [itex]\sum_{k=0}^{n} 1 =n+1[/itex] is the answer to you above question.
 
O.K. I getting close to understanding this. What puzzles me is the last sum. Do you put n+1 so the first term isn't 0? I think I'm missing some information to understand this.
 
We put n+1 because that is what it is... You're adding up the number 1, n+1 times, so the answer is n+1.

But what's wrong with just multiplying out the power series?You can multiply (1+x+x^2+...)(1+x+x^2+...)

and count and think and, well, it's just true... there is nothing clever going on. to end up with x^n in the product you can only get it from multiplying x^r in the first and x^{n-r} and each of those multiplications contributes 1 to the coefficiant of x^n and there is one contributrion from each r as r goes from 0 to n so you get 1 added up n+1 times.
 
Last edited:
I think I understand this no, just hvae to get some practice solving these kind of problems. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K