The Affine Connection components

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Radiohannah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components Connection
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Radiohannah
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I have a few questions about how the Affine connection works.

I know the geodesic equation;


[tex]\Gamma^{\lambda}_{\mu \nu} = \frac{\partial x^{\lambda}}{\partial \xi^{\alpha}} \frac{\partial^{2} \xi^{\alpha}}{\partial x^{\nu} \partial x^{\mu}}[/tex]

So, for example, if I had the expression

[tex]\ddot{t} + \frac{A'}{A} \frac{dr}{d \tau} \frac{dt}{d \tau} = 0[/tex]

I can read off

[tex]\Gamma^{t}_{rt} = \frac{A'}{2A}[/tex]

Where the expression is divided by 2 because they are off diagonal terms, since the subscript indices are not the same.

I am not sure how this then applies to the actual


[tex]\Gamma_{t}[/tex]


matrix. Should the


[tex]\Gamma^{t}_{rt} = \Gamma^{t}_{tr}[/tex] terms be exactly the same? Because in an example the

[tex]\Gamma^{t}_{tr} = \frac{A'}{2A}[/tex]

Whereas the

[tex]\Gamma^{t}_{rt} = \frac{A'}{2B}[/tex]

And I don't understand why there should be a different letter on the denominator, I had always thought that if they are off-diagonal terms they should be identical?? Is that not the case?

And finally, as for all of the other components in the matrix, would these all just be 0? I think that because, I know that the Affine connection is not a tensor, and so will not have diagonal "1" terms like the metric tensor, so all other terms must be 0? Is that true?
ie
[tex]\Gamma^{t}_{tt} = 0[/tex] ?

Many thanks in advance!

Hannah
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Christoffell symbols are symmetric in the lower two indicies:

[tex]\Gamma^{a}{}_{bc}=\Gamma^{a}{}_{cb}[/tex]

So they should be the same. Check the reference.
 
jfy4 said:
The Christoffell symbols are symmetric in the lower two indicies:

It follows from the first equation by the commutativity of partial differentiation.