I The amount of time it will take to melt ice

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the time required to melt an ice cube in water, one must consider several factors, including the rate of heat transfer at the water-ice interface and the melting kinetics of the ice. The surface area-to-mass ratio of the ice cube is crucial, as it changes during melting and affects heat absorption. Stirring the water can enhance heat transfer by disrupting the insulating layer of water that forms around the ice. Practical experimentation may be necessary, as theoretical calculations are complex due to variable parameters. Overall, understanding the dynamics of heat transfer and ice melting is essential for accurate estimations.
ChessEnthusiast
Messages
115
Reaction score
3
What information / formulas do I need to calculate / estimate the amount of time required to melt an ice cube of temperature $T_i$ and mass $m$ in $M$ kg of $T_w$ temperature water?

Assume that the system is insulated.
Is it even possible?

I'm fine with Calculus.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is very difficult to answer theoretically. You would need to know the rate of heat transfer at the water-ice interface, and the kinetics of melting of ice, but also about very variable parameters such as the surface area to mass ratio of the ice cube (which will change as it melts) and the stirring of the water. (As the ice melts, it will be surrounded by a layer of water at 0°C that will insulate it from the surrounding water at Tw. Stirring will disperse this layer and assist heat transfer and melting.) This looks like a candidate for some suck-it-and-see practical experimentation.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, russ_watters and ChessEnthusiast
ChessEnthusiast said:
What information / formulas do I need to calculate / estimate the amount of time required to melt an ice cube of temperature $T_i$ and mass $m$ in $M$ kg of $T_w$ temperature water?

Assume that the system is insulated.
Is it even possible?

I'm fine with Calculus.

A thin sheet of ice will melt faster than a spherical block of ice, both of the same mass.

As mjc123 has stated, one also needs to know the surface area-to-volume ratio, because just using the parameters that you gave are not sufficient to answer your question.

Zz.
 
Making cocktails involves cracked ice and a lot of agitation - just saying'.
 
As I see it, thaw rate comes down to heat transfer across the ice surface 'stagnant' zone. Yes, this chilled layer will 'drip' due higher density. The bigger the ice surface to volume ratio, the greater the 'natural' rate. If a significant convective circulation develops, this may diminish the stagnant zone. A stirrer or sonic bath would strip it.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top