The arclength of a parametrized segment (integration).

Yami
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For two points p and q in ℝ^n, use the formula (20.3) to check that the arclength of the parametrized segment from p to q is ||p - q||.


Homework Equations


Formula (20.3):
A smooth parametrized path \gamma: [a, b]→ℝ^nis rectifiable, and its arclength l is given by
l = \int_{a}^{b}||\gamma '||


Norm of a point x = (x_1, ... , x_n) in ℝ^n is defined in this book as
||x|| = \sqrt{x_1^2 + ... + x_n^2}

The Attempt at a Solution


\gamma: [q, p]→ℝ^n
is defined as
\gamma (t) = (\gamma _1 (t), \gamma _2 (t), ... , \gamma _n (t))
t \in [q, p]
then
\gamma '(t) = (\gamma _1 '(t), ... , \gamma _n '(t))
||\gamma '(t)|| = \sqrt{(\gamma _1 '(t))^2+ ... + (\gamma _n '(t))^2}

l = \int_{q}^{p} \sqrt{(\gamma _1 '(t))^2+ ... + (\gamma _n '(t))^2} dt

I can't figure out how to integrate this though to get to ||p - q||.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to write out the actual parameterization. Start with ##p=(p_1,p_2,...,p_n)## and ##q = (q_1,q_2,...q_n)##. Write out the parameterization of the line pq and work out the integral.
 
I just realized p and q are in ##ℝ^n##. So [p, q] isn't an interval I can integrate over.
I just found the equation I should probably use: ##\gamma:[0,1]→ℝ^n## defined as ##\gamma (t) = tq + 1(1 - t)p## for ##t \in [0, 1]##.
Thanks for the hint.
 
Yami said:
I just realized p and q are in ##ℝ^n##. So [p, q] isn't an interval I can integrate over.
I just found the equation I should probably use: ##\gamma:[0,1]→ℝ^n## defined as ##\gamma (t) = tq + 1(1 - t)p## for ##t \in [0, 1]##.
Thanks for the hint.

Good start. Now calculate ##|\gamma'(t)|## and work out the ##t## integral. You can do it by components or work at this level.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top