raul_l
- 105
- 0
Homework Statement
Hello, I need to show that the radial part of the hydrogen wave function has the form
\rho^{l+1} e^{-\rho} L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1} (2\rho)
More specifically, I'm having trouble showing the L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1} (2\rho) part because what I get is L_{n+1}^{2l+1} (2\rho). The derivation is relatively easy and it makes me furious that I'm unable to find the mistake.
Homework Equations
L_{\alpha} (x) = e^x \frac{d^{\alpha}}{dx^{\alpha}} (e^{-x}x^\alpha)
L_{\alpha}^\beta (x) = \frac{d^{\beta}}{dx^{\beta}} L_{\alpha} (x) = \frac{d^{\beta}}{dx^{\beta}} (e^x \frac{d^{\alpha}}{dx^{\alpha}} (e^{-x}x^\alpha))
The Attempt at a Solution
This equation should be correct:
\rho \frac{d^2}{d \rho^2} f(\rho) + 2(l+1-\rho) \frac{d}{d \rho} f(\rho) + (2n-2(l+1)) f(\rho) = 0
Next I introduce the following parameters
\alpha = n+1
\beta = 2l+1
Then the last equation becomes
(2\rho) \frac{d^2}{d (2\rho)^2} f(2\rho) + (\beta+1-(2\rho)) \frac{d}{d (2\rho)} f(2\rho) + (\alpha-\beta) f(2\rho) = 0
First I deal with the case \beta=0
(2\rho) \frac{d^2}{d (2\rho)^2} f(2\rho) + (1-(2\rho)) \frac{d}{d (2\rho)} f(2\rho) + \alpha f(2\rho) = 0
I can show that the solution to this is f(2\rho) = L_\alpha (2\rho)
Next I take the \beta'th derivative of the last equation and get
(2\rho) \frac{d^\beta}{d (2\rho)^\beta} (\frac{d^2}{d (2\rho)^2} L_\alpha (2\rho)) + (\beta + 1-(2\rho)) \frac{d^\beta}{d (2\rho)^\beta} \frac{d}{d (2\rho)} L_\alpha (2\rho) + (\alpha - \beta) \frac{d^\beta}{d (2\rho)^\beta} L_\alpha (2\rho) = 0
Now by writing
f(2\rho) \equiv \frac{d^\beta}{d (2\rho)^\beta} L_\alpha (2\rho)) \equiv L_\alpha^\beta (2\rho)
I arrive at
(2\rho) \frac{d^2}{d (2\rho)^2} f(2\rho) + (\beta+1-(2\rho)) \frac{d}{d (2\rho)} f(2\rho) + (\alpha-\beta) f(2\rho) = 0
which clearly has the solution L_\alpha^\beta (2\rho) = L_{n+1}^{2l+1} (2\rho)
If you need me to show more thoroughly some of the steps then I can do this. I just didn't want to bother with too many details.
Of course, there's always the chance that I've made a typo somewhere, because the derivations of special functions are quite cumbersome. So far, I've been unable to find anything.
If anyone could take 2 minutes to analyze this I'd really appreciate it.