The clue to the proof of Riemann hypothesis

robert80
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
This could be the way to proof. remember, this is not a proof.

today I found a clue to solution to Riemann hypothesis:

Let it be Riemann zeta function :ζ(s)

The proof that all the non trivial zeroes lie on the critical strip when s = 1/2 + it

let us suppose there are other zeroes having the real part between 0 < Re < 1/2

since to sattisfy the convergence of Re between 0 and 1/2 we know that THE VERY SAME AMOUNT OF ZEROS would accour symetrically to Re = 1/2

so the zeroes would accure on Re(1/2 - x) and they would occur on Re = (1/2 + x) because of convergence condition.

since the 2 values of Riemann Zeta functions of applying to it 2 different s1 and s2 s1 = 1/2 - X +b*i and s2 = 1/2 + X +b*i never equal, that means they couldn't have the same zeroes symetrically distributed to the Re = 1/2

---------------> the zeroes occur at Re=(1/2) if they exist.

The end.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If this is of any help to somebody, I would be glad, if not I appologize. I will take now some days off of Math problems. And yes, there is a great possibility, I am wrong... But I feel really passionate about Math and I think I will go to study theoretical Math. Greetings to all.
 
Revised :

In order to sattisfy DIVERGENCE criteria on interval 1> Re > 0 the zeroes are distributed simetrically to the Re = 1/2. Sorry I mixed the terms ...
 
REVISED:This could be the way to proof. remember, this is not a proof.

today I found a clue to solution to Riemann hypothesis:

Let it be Riemann zeta function :ζ(s)

The proof that all the non trivial zeroes lie on the critical strip when s = 1/2 + it

let us suppose there are other zeroes having the real part between 0 < Re < 1/2

since to sattisfy the divergence criteria of Re between 0 and 1 we know that THE VERY SAME AMOUNT OF ZEROS would accour on the right of Re=1/2 symetrically to Re = 1/2

so the zeroes would accure on Re(1/2 - x) and they would occur on Re = (1/2 + x) because of divergence condition.

since the 2 values of Riemann Zeta functions of applying to it 2 different s1 and s2 s1 = 1/2 - X +b*i and s2 = 1/2 + X +b*i never equal, that means they couldn't have the same zeroes symetrically distributed to the Re = 1/2

---------------> the zeroes occur at Re=(1/2) if they exist.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top