The Conditions for Biot-Savart Law to Ampere's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conditions under which a magnetic field (B-field) obeys the Biot-Savart Law and Ampere's Law, emphasizing that both laws are equivalent when the fields are time-independent and the stationary current satisfies the continuity equation. Additionally, it highlights the relationship between these laws and Faraday's Law, noting that applying Faraday's Law leads to complex non-local equations compared to the more intuitive local representation provided by Jefimenko's equations. The conversation also touches on the relativistic nature of electromagnetic fields, indicating that electric and magnetic components form a unified field-strength tensor. Furthermore, the laws have practical applications in aerodynamics, particularly in calculating velocities induced by vortex lines. Understanding these conditions is crucial for accurately applying electromagnetic principles in various fields.
tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
Mathematically, what conditions must a B-field that obeys the Biot-Savart Law satisfy before it will obey Ampere's Law?

Additionally, what conditions must the B-field obey in order to satisfy Faraday's Law?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vanhees71 said:
The Biot-Savart and Ampere's Law are equivalent. The condition for their validity is that (a) all fields are time-independent and (b) that the stationary current obeys the (reduced) continuity equation ##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{j}=0##. See

http://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/ampere-law-discussion-ver2.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/5/058001

thanks. I wanted to apply this to Faraday's Law since it also follows Stokes' theorem.
 
Of course, you can do that, but that leads to very cumbersome and not very physically intuitive non-local equations. The local representation is given by Jefimenko's equation rather than by lumping field parts into the sources. It's also clear from relativistic covariance, that the electromagnetic field builds one "unit" in the sense that the electric and magnetic components together are the components of the electromagnetic field-strength (or Faraday) tensor ##F_{\mu \nu}## and the charge density and current density together are components of a four-vector field ##j^{\mu}=(c \rho,\vec{j})##.
 
Both laws have applications in aerodynamics for calculating the velocity induced by vortex lines by using the magnetic induction current formula B=µH
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top