The difference between structural unit and repeating unit?

AI Thread Summary
Structural units and repeating units serve different roles in polymer chemistry. Structural units are the distinct substructures derived from the inputs used to create the polymer, while repeating units are the segments that repeat throughout the polymer chain. For example, polyethylene terephthalate has two structural units but only one repeating unit, which is represented as [-O-CH2-CH2-O-CO-Ph-CO-]. In contrast, polyethylene has a repeating unit of [-CH2-] but its structural unit is [-CH2-CH2-], derived from ethylene. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping polymer composition and behavior.
royzizzle
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The difference between structural unit and repeating unit

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_unit

wikipedia gives an example with polyethylene terephthalate but I can't figure it out based on the slight difference
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Polyethylene teraphthalate has two structural units but only has one repeating unit.

Structural units are substructures that are derived directly from the inputs.

If you call the repeating unit [-R-], then you can write a polymer as -[-R-]-n.

So while polyethylene teraphthalate has the repeating unit [-O-CH2-CH2-O-CO-Ph-CO-], it's built from two distinct inputs and each of those is a different structural unit.

To take another example, polyethylene, which once was also called polymethylene, -[-CH2-]-n, has the repeating unit [-CH2-] but has the structural unit [-CH2-CH2-] because it is derived from ethylene, not methyl radical.
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top