The Double Helix - Hydrogen bonding and stability

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on ranking the stability of DNA base pairs, specifically thymine-adenine (A-T) and cytosine-guanine (C-G). It is established that the C-G pair is more stable due to having three hydrogen bonds compared to the two in the A-T pair. The greater bond energy required to break the C-G pair indicates its stronger stability. Participants emphasize the concept of "stickiness" in molecular bonding, where more bonds lead to greater stability. Overall, the consensus is that C-G is the most stable pair, followed by A-T, with other pairings being less stable.
Vivianian
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Rank the following base pairs according to their stability.
Rank from most to least stable. To rank items as equivalent, overlap them.

1zlyt8p.png


-------------
I have found out that the first one is thymine-adenine pair and the second one is a cytosine-guanine pair. The third one is cytosine paired with adenine, which doesn't make sense, so it must be the least stable. Now how do I go about determining if the A-T pair or C-G pair is more stable? It has something to do with the number of bonds, maybe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vivianian said:
It has something to do with the number of bonds, maybe?

I think that is a safe assumption. Now just ask yourself which pair would require the most energy to break the hydrogen bonds; G-C with three H-bonds, or A-T with two H-bonds? This will be the most stable pairing.
 
I know that the larger the bond energy, the more energy is needed to break the bond. If the more energy is needed to break the bond, that means the bond is stronger and more stable. Is this correct?
 
Vivianian said:
I know that the larger the bond energy, the more energy is needed to break the bond. If the more energy is needed to break the bond, that means the bond is stronger and more stable. Is this correct?

Yep. Then just follow mplayer's advice and you should get the answer. I imagine them as being sticky: the more points (bonds) that can stick togeather, the more sticky the molecules are and the harder they are to pull apart!
 
nobahar said:
I imagine them as being sticky: the more points (bonds) that can stick togeather, the more sticky the molecules are and the harder they are to pull apart!

That's a nice trick. Thanks for the advice! :)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top