The effect of a stationary proton on a stationary electron

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mindstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Proton
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance below a stationary proton where the upward force on a stationary electron equals its weight. The user applied Newton's law of gravitation and Coulomb's law to equate the forces acting on the electron, arriving at a distance of 4.85 meters. However, they expressed discomfort with the assumption that the experiment occurs on Earth, questioning whether to use Earth's gravitational acceleration or calculate it in the proton's field. A response clarified that in homework problems, "weight" typically refers to the gravitational force on Earth unless specified otherwise. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context of terms like "weight" in physics problems.
Mindstein
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On the utterly unrealistic assumption that there are no other charged particles in the vicinity, at what distance below a proton would the upward force on an electron equal the electrons weight?

Homework Equations


I used Newtons universal law of gravitation as well as Coulombs law.

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically, I equated the sum of the forces on the electron (due to the proton) to the weight of the electron. The sum of the aforementioned forces correspond to the gravitational attractive force and the electrical attractive force (both forces being produced by the proton).

I got an answer of 4.85 meters. Right or wrong, I don't really care because the number will be wrong by virtue of entering the values into the calculator wrong (hopefully); I'm definitely comfortable with the methodology. My problem is the language in this exercise. The weight of the electron depends on the acceleration due to gravity (which, on earth, is 9.8 m/s^2) of some other mass.

I arrived at 4.85 meters by assuming that this experiment takes place on earth. I'm not comfortable with making that assumption, but I'm also not comfortable with having to calculate the acceleration of a mass that is in the presence of a proton (the mass, for this example, would be the electron). I feel like calculating such a quantity would be out of the scope and spirit of the problem.

In a nutshell, my question pertains to the intent of the word 'weight'. Do I calculate 'g' for an object in the presence of its gravitational field or do I assume this experiment takes place on earth?

Any guidance on this would be much appreciated. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If "weight"/"gravity"/... is used without any other information, the experiment always takes place on the surface of earth. This is just a convention for homework problems.
 
Ah great, thanks mfb. I appreciate it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top