The experiment that proved electrons to compose current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Tolman-Stewart experiment of 1916, which provided the first direct evidence that electrons, rather than protons, are the charge carriers in metals. This was demonstrated when a rapidly accelerated metal rod exhibited a negative charge at its rear surface due to the movement of electrons. The properties of cathode rays and the Hall effect further support the notion that current carriers are negatively charged. Additionally, there is curiosity about how a p-type semiconductor would behave under similar conditions, as it would create positive "holes" when electrons are displaced. Overall, the experiment solidified the understanding of electron movement in conductors as the basis for electric current.
hbweb500
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
I remember reading somewhere that it was discovered that electrons, not protons, composed current when an accelerated conductor was found to have slightly negative charge on the end opposite the direction of the acceleration. Because of this it was determined that electrons were free to move in conductors, not protons, and electrons were what composed current.

I can't find the name of this experiment, does anyone remember?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never heard of it. I think the properties of cathode rays (electrons) seems to have determined that charge carriers were negatively charged.
 
The Hall effect shows that the current carriers are negative.
 
True and true, but I managed to find the text I was looking for, and it was called the Tolman-Stewart experiment. From Knight's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Volume 4":

"The Tolman-Stewart experiment of 1916 was the first direct evidence that electrons are the charge carriers in metals. Tolman and Stewart caused a metal rod to accelerate very rapidly. The inertia of the charge carriers within the metal (and Newton's first law) causes them to be "thrown" to the rear surface of the metal rod as it accelerates away...Tolman and Stewart found that the rear surface of a metal rod becomes negatively charged as it accelerates."
 
Cool, hbweb. I wonder how a P-type semiconductor would measure.
 
I don't know much about p-type semiconductors, but from what I have read a positive "hole" is created when an electron is accepted by the impurity. If all of the electrons are shoved to the back of the rod when it is accelerated, then all of the positive holes should be created back there, and thus the end should test positive...

I guess it was for the better that Tolman and Stewart didn't use a p-type when they did their test.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top