- #1
cstromeyer
- 9
- 0
Dear Group,
This new paper by two famous Princeton mathematicians named J.H.
Conway and S. Kochen examines a particular case in quantum mechanics
(QM) and then proves a new theorem which shows that if humans can be
said to have "free will" then so do elementary physical particles.
They show technically that free will means the opposite of both
determinism and randomness (chance):
http://www.ams.org/notices/200902/rtx090200226p.pdf
This second paper on QM shows that the wavefunction of QM is both non-
local and non-sequential which means that the wavefunction of QM
transcends conventional notions of causality, probability, time and
space:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0102109
Thus, we see that free will must exist and that this free will must
have a meta-physical origin.
Further, the work of Giuseppe Castagnoli also shows that quantum
computation must be non-deterministic thus agreeing with my new
argument above. For example, consider his newest paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.4209
It deals with the fact that a quantum algorithm requires the number of
operations (function evaluations) of a classical algorithm that knows
in advance 50% of the information that specifies the solution of the
problem. In a way, the quantum algorithm works like it knew beforehand
50% of the information about the solution it will find in the future.
This new paper by two famous Princeton mathematicians named J.H.
Conway and S. Kochen examines a particular case in quantum mechanics
(QM) and then proves a new theorem which shows that if humans can be
said to have "free will" then so do elementary physical particles.
They show technically that free will means the opposite of both
determinism and randomness (chance):
http://www.ams.org/notices/200902/rtx090200226p.pdf
This second paper on QM shows that the wavefunction of QM is both non-
local and non-sequential which means that the wavefunction of QM
transcends conventional notions of causality, probability, time and
space:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0102109
Thus, we see that free will must exist and that this free will must
have a meta-physical origin.
Further, the work of Giuseppe Castagnoli also shows that quantum
computation must be non-deterministic thus agreeing with my new
argument above. For example, consider his newest paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.4209
It deals with the fact that a quantum algorithm requires the number of
operations (function evaluations) of a classical algorithm that knows
in advance 50% of the information that specifies the solution of the
problem. In a way, the quantum algorithm works like it knew beforehand
50% of the information about the solution it will find in the future.