The force between charged and neutral object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an experiment using a Van de Graaff generator to measure the force between a charged sphere and a neutral sphere. The tutor suggested that the force is proportional to 1/r^5, but this was not thoroughly explained. The participant noted that Coulomb's law indicates a 1/r^2 relationship for forces between charged objects, raising questions about the force between charged and neutral objects. They proposed using two small conductors connected by a wire to create a dipole, which could lead to the observed r^-5 relationship. The experiment confirmed that this model accurately produces the expected force relationship.
Aldo Biko
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I did a lab involving Van de Graaff generator. Basically, below the charged sphere, I put a neutral sphere on a scale and measure the difference in mass which then I can calculate the force acting on the neutral sphere. I repeated the experiment with different distance. What is the proportionality between the force and the distance? One of the tutor said the force is proportional to 1/r^5 but he didn't explain much about it.

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that from coulomb law that the force is proportional to 1/r^2. However I can only use this equation to calculate the force between two charged objects, while my experiment is about the force between a charged and a neutral object.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose F = k/rn. You can certainly write F1=k/r1n and F2=k/r2n. Can you put these two equations together with the forces and distances that you measured and find k and n? An accurate determination might be difficult with just two measurements, but if that's all you got, it will have to do.
 
Last edited:
Don't know if this works, but you could try considering instead two small conductors, lined up with the charged sphere, connected by a short thin wire. These would form a dipole from the induced charges. You might obtain an r-5 relationship in that model.

Edit: it does indeed produce that relationship.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top