The Friedmann equation in a lambda-dominated universe

_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that a lambda-dominated euclidean universe entails an exponential expansion.

Homework Equations



Equation of state is P=-E (E=epsilon)
There is no curvature (i.e. a flat universe)

The Friedmann equation is then

((a(dot)/a)^2)=((8piG)/3c^2)E + lambda/3 (eq. 1)

which -- and this is where I get lost -- is equivalent to

((a(dot)/a)^2)=((8piG)/3c^2)Elambda (eq. 2)

The Attempt at a Solution



lambda/3 = ((8piG)/3c^2)Elambda, but if I make this substitution into the Friedmann equation, I get

((a(dot)/a)^2)=((8piG)/3c^2)E + ((8piG)/3c^2)Elambda

What am I doing wrong? I'm after (eq. 2).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have two different representations of the same thing in the Friedmann equation. A constant term lambda is the same thing as a vacuum energy source term satisfying rho=-p. Which one do you want to work with? You don't need both.
 
I'm not sure I understand. Could you elaborate further?
 
_Andreas said:
I'm not sure I understand. Could you elaborate further?

What part don't you understand? A fluid with E=-p satisfies dE/dt=0 by the conservation equation, so is a constant. lambda is also a constant. You have two constants. It's a little redundant.
 
I just wanted to say thank you for your efforts, Dick. They're appreciated. I forgot to say that. Sorry!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top