The General Relativity Metric and Flat Spacetime

[Dale]

You still have 3 coordinates. None of what you wrote in the OP involved adding extra coordinates to the manifold.

 

[Ben Niehoff]

{ds}^{2}{=}{R}^{2}{[}{(}\frac{xdy-ydx}{{x}^{2}{+}{y}^{2}}{)}^{2}{+}\frac{{x}^{2}{+}{y}^{2}}{{R}^{2}}{(}\frac{dz}{\sqrt{{x}^{2}{+}{y}^{2}}}{)}^{2}{]}

As Dale points out, this still has too many coordinates.

In addition, it is not of the form

ds^2 = du^2 + dv^2

for any coordinate functions u, v. (Remember, the one-forms du, \ dv should be closed, i.e. ddu = 0 and ddv = 0).

 

[Dickfore]

According to your 'prescription':
<br /> x^{1} = \theta<br />
<br /> x^{2} = \sin{(\theta)} \, \phi<br />
Then:
<br /> dx^{1} = d\theta<br />
But:
<br /> dx^{2} = \sin{(\theta)} \, d\phi + \phi \, \cos{(\theta)} \, d\theta<br />
it contains the differentials of both angles. Solving from these equations for d\theta and d\phi, we get:
<br /> d\theta = dx^{1}<br />
<br /> d\phi =\frac{dx^{2} - \phi \, \cos{(\theta)} \, d\theta}{\sin{(\theta)}} = \frac{dx^{2} - \frac{x^{2}}{\sin{(x^{2})}} \, dx^{1}}{\sin{(x^{2})}}<br />
Then, the metric is rewritten as:
<br /> ds^{2} = (dx^{1})^{2} + \left(dx^{2} - \frac{x^{2}}{\sin{(x^{2})}} \, dx^{1}\right)^{2}<br />

<br /> ds^{2} = \left[1 + \frac{(x^{2})^{2}}{\sin^{2}{(x^{2})}}\right] \, (dx^{1})^{2} - 2 \, \frac{x^{2}}{\sin{(x^{2})}} \, dx^{1} \, dx^{2} + (dx^{2})^{2}<br />
This is not a metric for a flat space. So, the coordinates x^{1} and x^{2} do not describe a flat space.

 

[Anamitra]

In addition, it is not of the form

ds^2 = du^2 + dv^2

for any coordinate functions u, v. (Remember, the one-forms du, \ dv should be closed, i.e. ddu = 0 and ddv = 0).

The metric I have written is the same as[equivalent to]

{ds}^{2}{=}{R}^{2}{(}{d}{\phi}^{2}{+}{Sin}^{2}{\theta}{d}{\theta}^{2}{)}
Do you find any problem now?

 

[Anamitra]

Given Metric:
{ds}^{2}{=}{R}^{2}{(}{d}{\phi}^{2}{+}{sin}^{2}\theta{d}{\theta}^{2}{)}

Consider the metric:

{ds}^{2}{=}{dx}^{2}{+}{dz}^{2}

Transformations:

{z}{=}{R}{[}{1}{-}{cos}{\theta}{]}
And

{x}{=}{R}{\phi}

{dz}{=}{R}{sin}{\theta}{d}{\theta}
{dx}{=}{R}{d}{\phi}

{ds}^{2}{=}{dx}^{2}{+}{dy}^{2}{=}{R}^{2}{sin}^{2}{\theta}{d}{\theta}^{2}{+}{R}^{2}{d}{\phi}^{2}
{=}{R}^{2}{(}{d}{\phi}^{2}{+}{Sin}^{2}{\theta}{d}{\theta}^{2}{)}

 

[Dickfore]

But, the original metric was:
<br /> ds^{2} = R^{2} \, \left(d\theta^{2} + \sin^{2}{\theta} \, d\phi^{2}\right)<br />
Can't you see the difference?

 

[Anamitra]

The matter is quite simple. I have got the original metric from the flat spacetime metric using transformations. This is allowed.You may use the reverse transformations to pass from curved space to flat space.

It depends totally on the type of transformations you are using,what you would obtain finally.

We should always use a favorable type of transformations

 

[Dickfore]

You're a tool.

 

[Ben Niehoff]

Consider the metric:

{ds}^{2}{=}{dx}^{2}{+}{dz}^{2}

Transformations:

{z}{=}{R}{[}{1}{-}{cos}{\theta}{]}
And

{x}{=}{R}{\phi}

{dz}{=}{R}{sin}{\theta}{d}{\theta}
{dx}{=}{R}{d}{\phi}

{dx}^{2}{+}{dy}^{2}{=}{R}^{2}{sin}^{2}{\theta}{d}{\theta}^{2}{+}{R}^{2}{d}{\phi}^{2}
{=}{R}^{2}{(}{d}{\phi}^{2}{+}{Sin}^{2}{\theta}{d}{\theta}^{2}{)}

But it is not the metric I asked for. The metric on a sphere is

ds^2 = d\theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta \; d\phi^2.

Notice the difference between this and yours.

 

[Anamitra]

The basic aim is to pass from curved spacetime to flat spacetime in a global manner--and that has been done[post #35].

ds^2 is invariant: but the metrics have different

{ds}^{2}{=}{dx}^{2}{+}{dy}^{2} \is a flat space metric,while

{ds}^{2}{=}{R}^{2}{(}{d}{\phi}^{2}{+}{sin}^{2}{\theta}{d}{\theta}^{2}
represents curved space

We may pass from one metric to the other by Global Transformations. "ds^2" does not change in the process of transformations.
[It is important to observe that the transformations in #35 are of a global nature]

 

[Ben Niehoff]

The metric (coordinates re-labeled to avoid confusion with spherical metric)

ds^2 = R^2 (du^2 + \sin^2 v \; dv^2)

is NOT curved, as a relatively quick calculation of its curvature reveals. Try it.

 

[Anamitra]

So far as the metric coefficients are concerned it has to represent curved space[Hope v has been used as a variable]

 

[Ben Niehoff]

It's clear that you have some very deep-seated misunderstandings. I hope that upon further reading and reflection you will get over them. I suggest you practice actually computing some curvature tensors.

 

[Anamitra]

The metric (coordinates re-labeled to avoid confusion with spherical metric)

ds^2 = R^2 (du^2 + \sin^2 v \; dv^2)

is NOT curved, as a relatively quick calculation of its curvature reveals. Try it.

Take R as a fixed Schwarzschild Radius[coordinate value]
[You may think in parallel transporting a vector round the 45 degree latitude and see if it turns when it comes back to the original point--you will find curved space]

[On the same metric try out the transformations given in post #35]

 

[WannabeNewton]

Take R as a fixed Schwarzschild Radius[coordinate value]
[You may think in parallel transporting a vector round the 45 degree latitude and see if it turns when it comes back to the original point--you will find curved space]

[On the same metric try out the transformations given in post #35]

For that metric it is a rather trivial task to show that R^{\alpha }_{\beta \mu \nu } = 0 identically.

 

[Anamitra]

For that metric it is a rather trivial task to show that R^{\alpha }_{\beta \mu \nu } = 0 identically.

In such a situation a parallel-transported vector should not turn if it is taken round the 45 degree latitude and brought back to its initial position.
[The Christoffel Symbols work out to diffrent values in the Schwarzschild sphere and the ordinary sphere]

 

[TrickyDicky]

Anamitra, if you apply a global transformation to the metric of the ambient embedding space of the manifold you are considering you end up changing the original manifold, it is no longer the same spacetime, you just can't do that. You have a restriction equation that keeps you from doing it.
So, no you can't do the coordinate transformation in the OP and still have a curved manifold. Just like you can't do it in the case of the 2-sphere manifold acting from the flat ambient space, that 3 space is restrained to the 2-sphere surface and that restricts the kind of global transformations you may perform on it.
The paralled-transported vector turns just because you are restricting it explicitly with certain coordinate restricition, if you do a global transformation in the embedding space you may no longer keep on the 2-sphere surface and therefore it doesn't represent the curved space you think it's representing.

 

[Dickfore]

Would an OP please close this topic? It's excruciating to read this troll.

 

[Dale]

So far as the metric coefficients are concerned it has to represent curved space[Hope v has been used as a variable]

I just worked out the curvature. The above metric is flat, not curved. There is one non-zero Christoffel symbol, but no non-zero components to the Riemann curvature tensor. So it is apparently some sort of "polar-like" coordinates in a flat space.

Why do you think that "it has to represent curved space"?

 

[Dickfore]

Of course it is:
<br /> \sin^{2}{(\theta)} \, d\theta^{2} = \left(d(\cos{\theta})\right)^{2}<br />

 

[TrickyDicky]

Would an OP please close this topic? It's excruciating to read this troll.

An OP? OP=Original Poster(or Post) He can't close it.
Besides I don't think he is trolling, he just got it wrong and it's one of the purposes of Forums like this to help him get it.

 

[Dale]

My experience with Anamitra is that he takes a long time to "get it", and fights you every step of the way, but eventually he comes around and understands. He is also eventually willing to work through the math and once he does so he tends to convince himself. I wouldn't recommend closing the thread.

 

[Dickfore]

Ok, I am sorry. Point taken. I lost my temper for awhile.

 

[Dale]

No problem, the way he fights you every step of the way can indeed be very frustrating. See: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=423334

 

[Anamitra]

OK, I think at this point you will not be convinced unless you actually do a computation. So let's simplify this as much as possible and do just 2 dimensions. Take the following metric for the sphere,

ds^2 = d\theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta \; d\phi^2,
and show us how to obtain a globally flat coordinate system, using your method.

This seriously heavy issue was raised by Ben Niehoff.[Post #18]

 

[Anamitra]

So, please eliminate one of them and express the metric in the form:

<br /> ds^{2} = A(x, y) \, dx^{2} + 2 \, B(x, y) \, dx \, dy + C(x, y) \, dy^{2}<br />

What Dickfore said in post #24

 

[Anamitra]

In Relation to Post #46

Is DaleSpam ready to confirm that the Schwarzschild sphere[for a fixed coordinate r] is not a curved space?

I have made a claim[through #46] that it represents curved space. The answer from a Science Advisor would be crucial to the issue.

 

[Dale]

In Relation to Post #46

Is DaleSpam ready to confirm that the Schwarzschild sphere[for a fixed coordinate r] is not a curved space?

I have made a claim[through #46] that it represents curved space. The answer from a Science Advisor would be crucial to the issue.

This metric (not a sphere) is flat:
ds^2=R^2(d\phi^2+\sin^2(\theta) d\theta^2)


This metric (a sphere) is not flat:
ds^2=R^2(d\theta^2+\sin^2(\theta) d\phi^2)

 

[TrickyDicky]

In post number 35 you got this metric:
ds^2=R^2(d\phi^2+\sin^2(\theta) d\theta^2)

from:

ds^2=dx^2+dz^2

Wich is the metric of a flat surface.

It is a basic axiom of differential geometry that you cannot get from a flat surface to an intrinsically curved surface by any coordinate transformation.
Therefore the metric you get is still flat.

 

[WannabeNewton]

The paralled-transported vector turns just because you are restricting it explicitly with certain coordinate restricition, if you do a global transformation in the embedding space you may no longer keep on the 2-sphere surface and therefore it doesn't represent the curved space you think it's representing.

I don't see how the transported vector turns though under the metric ds^{2} = d\phi ^{2} + sin^{2}(\theta) d\theta ^{2}. If for example you choose to parallel transport the vector \mathbf{v} around a circle of latitude \theta = \theta _{0} then you could set up the parametric equation for the circle as u^{A}(t) = t\delta ^{A}_{1} + \theta _{0}\delta ^{A}_{2} and the tangent vector would be \dot{u^{A}} = \delta ^{A}_{1} and the parallel transport of the original vector , \bigtriangledown _{\dot{\mathbf{u}}}\mathbf{v} = 0, comes to \frac{\partial v^{A}}{\partial \phi } + \Gamma ^{A}_{B1}v^{B} = 0 and since for that metric that christoffel symbol vanishes I just get \frac{\partial v^{A}}{\partial \phi }= 0. If the vector's direction really does change maybe I interpreted the bases wrong; I interpreted them as they are on a 2 - sphere.