The Importance of Understanding Different Formulas in Uniform Circular Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the application of the formula T = 2πr/v in solving for the period of a conical pendulum. While the formula is valid, the solution is expressed in terms of the angle β and the length L, making it more practical for measurement. The key point is that the velocity v depends on the angle β, which complicates direct comparisons between the two formulas. By substituting expressions for v and R that relate to β, the equivalence of the two methods for calculating the period can be demonstrated. Understanding these relationships is crucial for correctly applying the formulas in uniform circular motion scenarios.
paprika213
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
https://i.imgur.com/4nynNBg.png

I cannot understand for the life of me why this problem doesn't just use T = 2πr/v to solve for the period to get T = 2π(Lsinβ)/v. Instead, it rearranges the formula for a(rad) = (4π^2R)/T^2 to solve for T, and arrives at a totally different answer, T = 2π√(Lcosβ/g).

So why doesn't the formula T = 2πr/v apply in this case?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
paprika213 said:
https://i.imgur.com/4nynNBg.png

I cannot understand for the life of me why this problem doesn't just use T = 2πr/v to solve for the period to get T = 2π(Lsinβ)/v. Instead, it rearranges the formula for a(rad) = (4π^2R)/T^2 to solve for T, and arrives at a totally different answer, T = 2π√(Lcosβ/g).

So why doesn't the formula T = 2πr/v apply in this case?
The formula applies but the solution is cast in terms of angle ##\beta## instead of the speed. That's because you need to measure both ##R## and ##v## to find the period. It is more practical to find the period by measuring angle ##\beta## and the unchanging length ##L##..
 
kuruman said:
The formula applies but the solution is cast in terms of angle ##\beta## instead of the speed. That's because you need to measure both ##R## and ##v## to find the period. It is more practical to find the period by measuring angle ##\beta## and the unchanging length ##L##..
Thank you, but it still doesn't seem like T = 2π(Lsinβ)/v and T = 2π√(Lcosβ/g) would equate. It seems like they would give different values for the period
 
paprika213 said:
Thank you, but it still doesn't seem like T = 2π(Lsinβ)/v and T = 2π√(Lcosβ/g) would equate. It seems like they would give different values for the period
How do you know? What is ##v## in your estimation? Note that it depends on ##\beta##. For example, if ##\beta=0## then ##v=0## because the conical pendulum will be hanging vertically. Can you relate ##v## to ##\beta##? Replacing ##v## and ##R## with expressions that depend on ##\beta## in ##T=\frac{2\pi R}{v}## should convince you that the two ways of writing the period are equivalent.
 
paprika213 said:
https://i.imgur.com/4nynNBg.png

I cannot understand for the life of me why this problem doesn't just use T = 2πr/v to solve for the period to get T = 2π(Lsinβ)/v. Instead, it rearranges the formula for a(rad) = (4π^2R)/T^2 to solve for T, and arrives at a totally different answer, T = 2π√(Lcosβ/g).

So why doesn't the formula T = 2πr/v apply in this case?
Hello @paprika213 .
:welcome:
You should use the upload button to upload any image you refer to on this forum.
Uniform Circ Mo 4nynNBg.png
 

Attachments

  • Uniform Circ Mo 4nynNBg.png
    Uniform Circ Mo 4nynNBg.png
    76.5 KB · Views: 322
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top