The invers of fixed Levi-Civita symbol's element

merhalag
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi every one, I am really confused on how to calculate the inverse of this Levi Civita symbole's element \epsilon^{tabc}, I tried to used this equation \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}=\delta^{\rho}_{\alpha}\delta^{\sigma}_{\beta}-\delta^{\rho}_{\beta}\delta^{\sigma}_{\alpha}

Homework Equations



In fact I am searching \left(\epsilon^{tabc}\right)^{-1} where the indices should be lower.


The Attempt at a Solution



Based on the equation above, is it correct if I write: \epsilon_{taef}\epsilon^{tabc}=\delta^{b}_{e}\delta^{c}_{f}-\delta^{b}_{f}\delta^{c}_{e}

I recall that \mu\nu\rho\sigma... are the diffeomorfism indices on curved space-time, "t" is the temporal indice and where "a,b,c..." are the spatial ones.

I apologize for my bad english once again. I have tried to do my best to make the problem statement as clear as possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this part of a problem that was given to you?

If so, you should post the full problem so helpers can see the context.

If not, then what do you mean by the "inverse" of a 4th-rank tensor. Are you searching for a tensor (which I'll denote as ##\rho##) which satisfies:
$$ \epsilon_{abcd} \; \rho^{abce} ~=~ \delta^e_d$$?
 
strangerep said:
Is this part of a problem that was given to you?

If so, you should post the full problem so helpers can see the context.

If not, then what do you mean by the "inverse" of a 4th-rank tensor. Are you searching for a tensor (which I'll denote as ##\rho##) which satisfies:
$$ \epsilon_{abcd} \; \rho^{abce} ~=~ \delta^e_d$$?

Yes, \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} \; \rho^{\alpha\beta\delta\lambda} ~=~3! \delta^\lambda_\sigma

Where \mu,\nu,,... are the diffeomorphism indices, once one has fixed this indices, how can I find the tensor \rho?

For exemple:

T^{a}=P_{a'}\epsilon^{tabc}\epsilon^{ta'}\:_{bc}, how can I find the expression of P_{a'} alone in fonction of T_{a} and probably the inverse of \epsilon^{tabc}...

May I made the context clear? I apologize once again for my bad english. :)
 
You didn't answer my first question, so I'll ask one more time: did someone else give you this problem to solve, or did you make it up yourself?

(I think you're still not telling me the entire question. If so, my answers might not be helpful.)

Anyway...

merhalag said:
T^{a}=P_{a'}\epsilon^{tabc}\epsilon^{ta'}\:_{bc}, how can I find the expression of P_{a'} alone in fonction of T_{a} and probably the inverse of \epsilon^{tabc}...
If I understand your opening post, "t" is a fixed index, so... can't your equation be written just in terms of the 3-index ##\epsilon## symbol, i.e.,

$$T^{a}=P_{a'}\epsilon^{0abc}\epsilon^{0a'}\:_{bc} ~~?$$
Using the earlier ##\epsilon## formula, replacing ##\sigma## and ##\beta## by 0, we get
$$\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho 0}\epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha 0}=\delta^{\rho}_{ \alpha}\delta^{0}_{0}-\delta^{\rho}_{0}\delta^{0}_{\alpha} ~.$$Now, we need consider only ##\rho\ne 0## and ##\alpha\ne 0##, otherwise the equation degenerates to ##0=0##.
Therefore, the last term above is 0, leaving ##\delta^\rho_\alpha##.

Can you apply this to your ##T^a## equation?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top