The Lift Question / reactive force on an object in a moving lift

  • Thread starter Thread starter druuuuuuuunnk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Lift
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating the reactive forces on an 80 kg mass in a moving lift, several key points were addressed. When the lift travels downwards at a steady speed, the reaction force is equal to the weight of the object, resulting in 800 N. During deceleration with a retardation of 4 m/s², the reactive force decreases to 480 N, illustrating that the object feels lighter as the lift stops. When the lift is at rest, the force remains at 800 N, similar to the steady speed scenario. The importance of understanding free-body diagrams and the correct application of Newton's second law was emphasized to avoid confusion in calculations.
druuuuuuuunnk
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass of 80 kg rests on the floor of a lift. (Take g = 10ms-2). Calculate:

(a) the reaction force exerted on the object by the floor, when the lift is
travelling at a steady speed of 2 ms-1 downwards.

(b) the reactive force exerted on the object by the floor of the lift, as its
downward motion is brought to rest by a retardation of 4ms-2.

(c) the reactive force exerted on the object by the floor, when the lift is at rest.

Gravity = 10 m/s-2

Homework Equations



F=M.A

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) becuase there is a steady speed downwards, do i just use gravity as the accelleration and nothing else? so F= (80) x (10) F=800 N

/or/ is it F= (80) x (10+2) F=960 N

(b) F= (80) x (10-4) so F= 480 N

(c) F= (80) x (10) F=800

My teacher this year has been pretty useless if you could help me understand this i would be really gratful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
druuuuuuuunnk said:

Homework Statement



A mass of 80 kg rests on the floor of a lift. (Take g = 10ms-2). Calculate:

(a) the reaction force exerted on the object by the floor, when the lift is
travelling at a steady speed of 2 ms-1 downwards.

(b) the reactive force exerted on the object by the floor of the lift, as its
downward motion is brought to rest by a retardation of 4ms-2.

(c) the reactive force exerted on the object by the floor, when the lift is at rest.

Gravity = 10 m/s-2

Homework Equations



F=M.A

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) becuase there is a steady speed downwards, do i just use gravity as the accelleration and nothing else? so F= (80) x (10) F=800 N

/or/ is it F= (80) x (10+2) F=960 N

The first.

One thing that is wrong with this second possibility is that you are trying to add an acceleration (10 ms^-2) to a velocity (2 ms^-1). This is never possible - in general you can't add or subtract quantities with different dimensions.

(b) F= (80) x (10-4) so F= 480 N

This says that the object appears lighter when the downward-moving lift comes to a halt. Does that tally with your everyday experience?

The way to solve this sort of problem is not to randomly plug numbers into an equation in the hope that it might be vaguely suitable. First draw a free-body diagram showing all the forces on the body you're considering. Then you can use Newton's second law, like you suggest: the sum of the forces is the mass times the acceleration - but this isn't very helpful unless you have carefully considered all the forces!

(c) F= (80) x (10) F=800

Correct - can you explain why? What is the crucial feature this case has in common with (a)?
 
THANKS FOR YOUR HELP FIRST OF ALL...

(c) & (a) both have only gravity acting on them as there acceleration?

(b) good point about the overall weight being lighter, i should have thought about it when i saw it was 480N.

So when the lift is coming to a stop you add to the overall acceleration and when the lift is accelerating downwards you take away, but if it was accelerating/decelerating upwards you would also add? becuase either way the force is pushing on the object.

thanks also for tell me about how you can't add things of a different dimension, its simple rules like that which my teacher has neglected to teach. you've saved me a lot of time and trouble!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top