The limit of Ultramassive Black Holes.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the limits of ultramassive black holes, exploring whether there is a maximum mass that such black holes can achieve and the factors influencing their growth. Participants examine theoretical implications, observational evidence, and the role of physical processes in black hole formation and growth.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that there is no fundamental physical limit to the mass of black holes, proposing that they could theoretically increase indefinitely through merging.
  • Others argue that physical processes may limit black hole growth, implying that the finite age of the universe could lead to a maximum mass for black holes, although they do not specify what that limit might be.
  • One participant notes the existence of billion solar mass black holes at high redshift, suggesting rapid growth in the early universe followed by slower growth in later epochs.
  • There is a discussion about Hawking radiation, with some participants expressing confusion about its role, particularly regarding its relationship with black hole mass and the significance of accretion disk radiation compared to Hawking radiation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether there is a limit to black hole mass. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the influence of physical processes and the implications of observational data.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the relationship between black hole mass and Hawking radiation are not fully resolved, and there are assumptions regarding the conditions necessary for the formation of ultramassive black holes that remain unaddressed.

Researcher X
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
The limit of "Ultramassive" Black Holes.

There is no limit, is there?


Both these links show not a limit, but a regulation that slows the growth of a black hole, due to radiating most of its food away:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14653-how-big-can-a-black-hole-grow.html
http://www.physorg.com/news140370694.html

Expansion is also stopping really big black holes from merging, but there doesn't seem to be a fundamental physical limit that I can find reference for.

Can black holes increase indefinitely by merging? Could you have a 50 Septillion solar mass monster within known physics? (Not that the conditions to form it can be met) Are there any strange effects that would become evident as black holes become so massive? As far as I can tell, it would become harder and harder to identify it as a black hole at all.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Hi Researcher X,

Thanks for the link, that was fascinating.

If some physical processes limit the growth of a black hole, then the limited growth coupled with the finite age of the universe gives you a maximum mass. So I don't think there is anything preventing a 50 septillion solar mass black hole from forming other than a lack of time.

The strange thing is that we see ~billion solar mass black holes at a redshift of 6 (1 billion years after the big bang). This means that black holes must grow really fast in the early universe, and then grow very little over the next 12 billion years.

-bombadil
 


That does not mesh well with my understanding. I though that Hawking radiation *decreased* as mass increased.
 


CRGreathouse said:
That does not mesh well with my understanding. I though that Hawking radiation *decreased* as mass increased.

Hello CRGreathouse,

When we talk about radiation from a black hole, we're talking about the radiation that originates from the disc of matter accreting onto the black hole. This accreting matter radiates far more energy than Hawking radiation does.

In general, Hawking radiation is not a significant process for the growth of astrophysical black holes (i.e. black holes that more than the mass of the sun). The amount of mass that is radiated away via Hawking radiation is minuscule compared to how much matter the black holes sucks in from interstellar gas and stars.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K