The meaning of the delta dirac function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the delta Dirac function in the context of charge density, specifically the function ρ(x,y,z) = cδ(x-a). The delta function δ(x-a) indicates that the charge density is concentrated at the point x = a, where it is theoretically infinite, while being zero elsewhere. Participants clarify that "a" is a specific coordinate where the charge density is non-zero, and "x" represents one of the spatial coordinates in three-dimensional space. The conversation emphasizes the need to interpret the delta function correctly, noting that it defines a plane of points (a,y,z) for any values of y and z. Overall, the thread seeks to deepen the understanding of delta functions and their implications in physics.
anban
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For a function ρ(x,y,z) = cδ(x-a), give the meaning of the situation and describe each variable.

Homework Equations



As far as units go, I know that:

ρ(x,y,z) = charge density = C/ m^3
δ(x-a) = 1/m
and if those two are correct, then b must have units of (C/m^2), which is some sort of surface charge distribution.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm new to delta dirac functions and my understanding is very superficial. When the function is not inside an integral, I especially don't understand it!

I think that "a" represents some sort of center point where there is infinite charge density, and x is the distance from the center.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi anban! :smile:
anban said:
ρ(x,y,z) = cδ(x-a)

I think that "a" represents some sort of center point where there is infinite charge density, and x is the distance from the center.

no, x is one of the three coordinates, (x,y,z)

hint: describe where is δ(x-a) ≠ 0 ? :wink:
 
I'm not sure that I understand-- does δ(x-a) ≠ 0 when x=a?

The way I am thinking about this now is that x-a is some coordinate point along a line?
 
eg hi anban! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
anban said:
The way I am thinking about this now is that x-a is some coordinate point along a line?

your mathematical language is rather strange :redface:

x-a is just an expression, you need to put it in a sentence

eg x-a = 0 is the whole plane x = a,

ie the points (a,y,z) for any values of y and z :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top