The Mysteries of Laser Mouse Size & Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter cave_cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Laser
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights that the size of laser mice is primarily influenced by ergonomic considerations rather than technical limitations, as batteries and internal components take up significant space. While it is technically feasible to create smaller mice, including pen-shaped designs, ergonomics plays a crucial role in usability, especially for precision tasks like CAD design. Users express concerns that very small mice can be difficult to control and may lead to discomfort or injury. The conversation also clarifies that wireless USB mice require batteries for operation, allowing for data transmission without a physical connection. Ultimately, while smaller designs are possible, market demand and ergonomic functionality are key factors in their development.
cave_cat
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
from online descriptions of laser mouse operating principle it's unclear to me that the mouse would need to be particularly big. Is the size of the mouse really based on ergonomics considerations and it could in practice be fit into much smaller case if we wanted to? Is the mouse actually mostly empty inside? Or is the current size important for making it from cheaper components than what would have been needed for a smaller design?

Also, so suppose we wanted to take an existing laser mouse and change its shape, such as in the best case to turn it into a pen shaped device like "Genius pen mouse" (TM). How hard would that be? Are the light source and sensor of the mouse straightforwardly extractable for installation in another device? How big are they? Are there any other components in the mouse that are "too big" and so would probably need to be placed outside the "pen mouse", such as in a "receiver" connected to the pen by a cable?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


I always get smaller mouse, but not too small. I think ergonomics is the key. Not everyone is have good dexterity with their fingers, I personally would not want a super small mouse. If you hold up your index and middle finger, you'll see it is not much narrower than the smallest mouse on the market. That is one gating factor of the width.

If you open the mouse, you'll see battery take up a lot of space. Even 2 AAA batteries take up room. That is part of the gating factor of the length. Also if it is too short, you can't really have a good grip to maneuver the mouse.

Yes, if there is a good reason, it would be so easy to put all the circuits into one small IC and be done with it. If you don't mind spending money on batteries, you can always use watch batteries and make the mouse very small. I don't see any reason stopping people from shrinking the mouse technically.
 


yungman said:
If you open the mouse, you'll see battery take up a lot of space. Even 2 AAA batteries take up room.
most mice I have used are of the usb kind. Do they really have batteries inside as well? What's the point in having battery in usb device?
 


Sorry, mind freeze. I have been using wireless all along and that's the only ones I willing to use. I totally forgot about the ones still have a tail!:smile:

Still, ergonomics matters. Most people will have problem controlling very small mouse. You talked about something a pen size, try, hold a USB memory stick, imagine there are 3 bottons on it and try to slide around on the table and push the button, I bet you'll find it's hard to control. I just tried it before I post, it is very tiring on the fingers as I have to hold it pretty tight to avoid it slip around. It would be very hard to control precision pointing like what I use for CAD design. You might get carpal tunnel problem using such a small device.

Also, they used to sell smaller mouse, I don't see them in the last two years. There must be not enough sales to support it. Believe me, I like small mouse for carrying around. I just don't think anything smaller than what they used to sell is going to have a broad market. Even my little grandson always use a huge mouse! It's a rat to me!
 


Just buy a 10$ mouse and break it open. Unless you are customer of the big fruit store you can probably even screw your mouse open and look inside without damaging it. It is most certainly easy for a manufacturer to make something pen shaped. The main obstacle is probably to get the lighting right. The light one in a mouse is using a lot of space, and maybe you would have some tilt problems, but in the end the optical mouse is just a camera, and these days those are very small. The necessary chips can probably fit into an oversized usb plug.
 


cave_cat said:
What's the point in having battery in usb device?

The point is for the device to operate wirelessly. The data is transmitted to and from the mouse and PC with a transceiver connected to the USB.

USB provides BOTH power and data communication, and it is a standard interface on PCs. By going with a battery and being wireless, you can maintain the standard data interface to the PC while still being powered.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Back
Top