The Mystery: Calculating Values for a Full Wave Bridge Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shahil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating values for a full-wave bridge rectifier circuit, which converts AC to DC using four diodes. Key equations include determining peak AC voltage, peak DC voltage, capacitor charging time, and ripple voltage. Specific values provided include a zener voltage of 3.9V, a resistor of 1100 ohms, and a capacitor of 1000uF. The calculations yield a peak AC voltage of 169.7V, a peak DC voltage of 169V, a capacitor charging time of 2.2 seconds, and a ripple voltage of 1.41V. This information is crucial for optimizing the circuit's performance.
Shahil
Messages
115
Reaction score
21
Help! Full Wave Bridge!

Hi guys!

Okay - I know that this is a straight-forward intermediate level circuit theory problem but uh...I've forgotten how to do it so I need help!

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

I have a full-wave rectifying bridge connected to a rectifying cap and a regulating zener diode. I do have values for the cap/zener/resistor (worked out through trial and error) but: What equations do you use to work out values for this circuit? I've looked all over the net and couple textbook but can't seem to find any good information on it! If it does help,
Please help people - I really need to figure this out!

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Note on pic:
Zener = 3.9V
R = 1100 ohms
C = 1000uF

Only the non-inverted coloured part of the circuit is the part that is concerend in my question. :smile:
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having the same problem with my powersupply circuit. Some people have suggested to use 4700uF in the rectifying caps... but I have no idea what the theory behind it is... I've just worked mine by trial & error in some simulation software called "Protel 99".
 


Hi there,

No need to panic, let's break it down step by step. The full-wave bridge circuit is used to convert alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC) by utilizing four diodes in a bridge configuration. This allows for a more efficient conversion compared to a half-wave rectifier.

To calculate the values for this circuit, we need to use the following equations:

1. Peak AC voltage (Vp) = RMS AC voltage (Vrms) x √2
2. Peak DC voltage (Vdc) = Vp - Vd (where Vd is the voltage drop across the diode, typically around 0.7V)
3. Capacitor charging time (t) = 2 x R x C (where R is the resistor value in ohms and C is the capacitor value in farads)
4. Ripple voltage (Vr) = Vdc / (2 x f x C) (where f is the frequency of the AC input)

Using these equations, we can calculate the values for the circuit in your picture.

1. Vp = Vrms x √2 = 120V x √2 = 169.7V
2. Vdc = Vp - Vd = 169.7V - 0.7V = 169V
3. t = 2 x R x C = 2 x 1100 ohms x 1000uF = 2.2 seconds
4. Vr = Vdc / (2 x f x C) = 169V / (2 x 60Hz x 1000uF) = 1.41V

Therefore, the values for your circuit are as follows:
- Peak AC voltage = 169.7V
- Peak DC voltage = 169V
- Capacitor charging time = 2.2 seconds
- Ripple voltage = 1.41V

I hope this helps! If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Good luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top