The Mystery of Computer Parts Doubling in 18 Months

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of computer parts, particularly RAM, doubling in capacity approximately every 18 months, a trend often attributed to Moore's Law. The cost-effectiveness of producing smaller silicon components allows manufacturers to fit more chips on a wafer, driving rapid advancements. While some believe this trend will eventually hit a limit due to physical constraints, others suggest that parallel processing may be the next frontier for computing power. Concerns about the implications of such rapid advancements are noted, alongside skepticism about the sustainability of continuous doubling. The conversation reflects on the unpredictable nature of technological evolution and the potential future of computing.
theallknower
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
how come some computer parts double they're power once in like 18 months or so?
it's kind of weird...alwais +100% and in 18 months or so...for example take the RAM memory...they came like this(in MB):
8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096,8192!
I didn't cheked,but the 16 GB RAM stick might be allready availabe(the 18 months have pased)...so how come?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Money.
Generally the cost of making silicon depends on the area.
As you make a part 1/2 as big you can fit 4x as many on the same area of a wafer for the same cost.
 
Just chalk it up to the cleverness of humankind. Moore's law seemed overly optmistic to a lot of people at first, and every once in a while some new frontier of engineering comes up against a barrier that looks like it will put a stop to this rate of increase, but some clever fellow allways finds a way to overcome the obsticle, and someone else comes up with an improvement on that guy's solution, and the rapid advancement continues with no end in sight.
 
yeah, but without some new physics, they'll hit a brick wall wrt to moore's law, soon.

the next big thing looks like it will be parallelization, tho. we may not be able to sustain the current rate of processor speed and transistor density, but we can make more of them. already, you've got home PCs with dual processing cores, and video boards with 128 or so cores. the age of supercomputers on your desktop with 128 processors is just around the corner. and maybe we don't want this, there are already concerns voiced about it. personally, i don't think we can stop it. we've already exported all the technology to do it. perhaps we will be the ones finding we can't import the latest and greatest technology.
 
LURCH said:
Just chalk it up to the cleverness of humankind. Moore's law seemed overly optmistic to a lot of people at first, and every once in a while some new frontier of engineering comes up against a barrier that looks like it will put a stop to this rate of increase, but some clever fellow allways finds a way to overcome the obsticle, and someone else comes up with an improvement on that guy's solution, and the rapid advancement continues with no end in sight.

it is natural to evolve,but I find it very unlikley to have double power at every 18 months(also,it's kind of strange to consider this a law,because it dosn't have a certan background,it should be rather a prediction)
imagine you buy a car with a top speed of 100 mph...in 18 months a new car will be avalable with a top speed of 200 mph,in another 18 months 400mph,800mph,1600mph,3200mph and so on,till c...(witch reminds me of a funny thing I saw on tv...a group of policemen were asigned with a radar to give speed tickets,and they found that a car was driving with 500 km/h,and the police was sued:) )
the only option that might've work is that they could alwais produce 8GB RAM sticks,but they started from 8 MB to gain as much money as posible,but this failes,because others would sale a better version...
I wonder how a computer would look line in 1 milion years:)
(if more's law would still be valid,you could buy youself a RAM stick of 16^666666 GB,required to play diablo 100000(considering a new diablo apears in 10 years)
till then they would anyway run out of names...if you go to buy a procesor or something,you have to ask something like "scuse me,do you have a super hiper extra mega turbo platinum edition procesor?)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top