The percentage error in the Radioactive substance Population

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the percentage error in the population of a radioactive substance after 9 days, given an underestimated half-life of 2.25 days, which is actually 2.5 days due to a 10% error. The original poster is struggling to relate this corrected half-life to the population after 9 days, seeking clarification on how to proceed. Other participants emphasize the need to show detailed calculations to identify any errors in the approach. The conversation highlights the importance of using the correct half-life to determine the population decay accurately. Ultimately, the original poster is looking for guidance on applying the correct equations to find the desired percentage error in population.
curious_mind
Messages
48
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Initially the half-life is measured 2.25 days, but later it was found underestimated by 10%. It is required to find the percentage error in "Population" of the substance after 9 days.
Relevant Equations
## N = N_0 e^{-\lambda t} ##
Please check the question below as given originally. Answer given is 25%. I am unable to proceed.

It is given that the half-life is underestimated by 10% therefore it must be larger than originally estimated.
What I can find using the percentage error formula is ##\left( \dfrac{Actual-Estimated}{Actual} \right) \times 100% = \left( \dfrac{Actual-2.25}{Actual} \right) \times 100%=10%##

So, ##Actual = 2.5 ~days##
Now, I am unable to make relation of this with the population after 9 days, which is required to find in the question. The answer given is ##25%##. How it is obtained?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Capture1.PNG
    Capture1.PNG
    23.8 KB · Views: 111
Physics news on Phys.org
What answer did you get, and how did you get there ?
 
hmmm27 said:
What answer did you get, and how did you get there ?
I am not getting required answer that's why posted question here. For The original question, I attached a picture. Answer given is 25%.

What I obtained is the actual half-life given the estimated half life and the underestimation percentage error of measuring half life.

It is Required to find the percentage error in the population ##N## after 9 days. I am unable to proceed for it.
 
curious_mind said:
I am not getting required answer that's why posted question here. For The original question, I attached a picture. Answer given is 25%.

What I obtained is the actual half-life given the estimated half life and the underestimation percentage error of measuring half life.

It is Required to find the percentage error in the population ##N## after 9 days. I am unable to proceed for it.
As @hmmm27 already said, please show your work. That you obtained a result that doesn't match a known answer is insufficient information for us to figure out what you did wrong, if anything.
 
kuruman said:
As @hmmm27 already said, please show your work. That you obtained a result that doesn't match a known answer is insufficient information for us to figure out what you did wrong, if anything.
I felt I already showed my work and even posted original question in the thread. But elaborating more..

We are given percentage error in half life measurement of radioactive substance as 10%. It is given as underestimated, which means the actual half-life should be more, ok?

Now percentage error of any physical quantity is given by (Actual-Estimated)/Actual * 100% which is given 10%

So (Actual-2.25)/Actual * 100% =10%

This way I obtained actual half-life to be = 2.5 days.

Now it is asked to find the percentage error in population of substance after 9 days.

Which I am unable to tell what to do next
 
You need to find the population with the correct half-life after 9 days. How will you do that? You have posted a "relevant equation." Do you think it could be a useful equation?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top