The physics of a tea cup on an accelerating airplane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum acceleration of an airplane before a cup of tea begins to slide on a table, given a coefficient of static friction of 0.250. The key concept involves balancing the inertial force acting on the cup due to the airplane's acceleration with the frictional force that keeps the cup stationary. It is noted that this inertial force is a pseudo force arising from analyzing the situation in a non-inertial frame of reference. Participants emphasize the importance of using inertial frames in basic mechanics for clarity. The conversation also reflects on the need for patience in guiding learners through problem-solving.
jess_08
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Imagine being on an airplane in flight. You have a cup of tea on a table in front of you. The plane then starts to accelerate at the same altitude it had initially. The coefficient of static friction between the cup and the table is 0.250. What is the maximum acceleration of the plane before the cup beings to slide on the table?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you any ideas?
 
If the accn of the plane in the horizontal dircn is 'a', then in the frame of the plane, there is an inertial force of ma acting on an object of mass m, opp to the direction of accn. This must be balanced by the frictional force if the cup is static. For the limiting case, equate frictional force to ma. You know the relationship between frictional force and weight of the object.
 
While what Shooting star said is correct, you should be aware that the 'inertial force' is what is known as a d'Alembert force or pseudo force and is so called because such forces don't arise from any physical interactions, instead they arise when we consider an interaction in a non-inertial (accelerating) reference frame. There's nothing wrong with using non-inertial reference frames, but in general while studying elementary mechanics it is better to only use inertial reference frames.
 
Hootenanny said:
Have you any ideas?

When I gave hints to the solution, I didn't notice that this post belonged to Introductory Physics. I should have allowed more time for the OP to come up with his own ideas. Sorry. Won't happen next time.
 
Shooting star said:
When I gave hints to the solution, I didn't notice that this post belonged to Introductory Physics. I should have allowed more time for the OP to come up with his own ideas. Sorry. Won't happen next time.
Don't worry bout it, there's nothing wrong with the advice you gave!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top