The Physics of Knocking Things Over

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peppino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum speed required for a bullet to knock over a cylinder, considering its dimensions and mass. Key points include the necessity of lifting the cylinder beyond 45 degrees for it to tip, as gravity will restore it otherwise. The rotational inertia of the cylinder is also a concern, along with the impact point of the force applied, which affects tipping ease. The center of gravity plays a crucial role; once the vertical line through it extends beyond the base, the cylinder becomes unstable. Overall, the relationship between the cylinder's dimensions and the angle of tipping is emphasized, with practical examples provided.
Peppino
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I've encountered a problem that I do not believe I am able to answer using my very basic knowledge of classical and calculus-based physics, dealing with knocking objects over.

Say we had a cylinder of length L and radius R and mass M. And suppose we shot a bullet of mass m at the very top of the cylinder, and suppose the bullet immediately bounces off the cylinder.

In terms of the above quantities, can we find the minimum speed necessary to knock over the cylinder? Is there anything else that needs to be determined?

I have found that the cylinder must be lifted greater than 45 degrees off the ground or else gravity will restore it, but I am unsure what the rotational inertia would be of this sort, among other things.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
correct me if I am wrong, but isn't there a correlation between the length of the cylinder and the angle at which it will begin to fall? also, I am assuming you're speaking of a cylinder of uniform volume, and not thicker at the top, middle, or bottom? additionally, it would seem to me that you would need to know precisly where on the cylinder the force was being applied. It would tip much easier if it were at the top edge versus the bottom edge. just a few things to consider.
 
Possibly, but on the various objects I have tested (a marker, a textbook, a can of Dr Pepper, a sliced cucumber) the 45 degree rule seems to uphold. If only I had a large range of various sized cylinders could this be tested.

And the bullet is direct towards the very top of the cylinder, and everything is uniform.
 
Peppino said:
Possibly, but on the various objects I have tested (a marker, a textbook, a can of Dr Pepper, a sliced cucumber) the 45 degree rule seems to uphold. If only I had a large range of various sized cylinders could this be tested.

Ever tried cutting down a tall (twenty meters or so) tree? It doesn't take anywhere near 45 degrees for it to be going over.

Find the center of gravity of the cylinder... When you tilt the cylinder enough that a vertical line through the center of gravity intersects the ground outside of the base of the cylinder, it's no longer stable and will tip over. The longer and thinner cylinder, the smaller the angle at which this happens.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top